St Georges Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Winter Pairs round 1 - September 19, 2017

6 tables - Mitchell

Back to the results
Pair NS1 - Liz Reese & Bob Watts. Total = 125.0 : 52.08% : 2nd=/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
1
2
3
4
4Cx
3S
6NT
2H
N
S
N
N
+510
+170
-50
-200
+510
+620
+460
-100
10
3
1
2
100.0%
30.0%
10.0%
20.0%
16 40.0% 16 40.00%
3 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
9
10
11
12
5Hx
2D
4S
2S
S
S
W
E
-1100
+110
-510
-110
-170
+110
-230
-90
0
6
4
5
0.0%
60.0%
40.0%
50.0%
15 37.5% 31 38.75%
4 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
4H
5Dx
S
E
W
E
+620
+50
-420
-750
+620
+100
+50
+140
6
6
0
0
60.0%
60.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12 30.0% 43 35.83%
5 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
17
18
19
20
6Cx
2S
1S
4H
N
N
N
W
-100
-100
+230
+200
+50
+50
+450
+200
8
7
4
7
80.0%
70.0%
40.0%
70.0%
26 65.0% 69 43.13%
6 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
21
22
23
24
4H
3C
4S
2H
N
S
N
S
+650
+110
+620
-50
+650
+200
+620
+100
10
8
6
6
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
60.0%
30 75.0% 99 49.50%
7 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
25
26
27
28
1H
3Hx
5Cx
4S
N
E
N
W
+110
+200
-300
-420
+200
+200
-100
+50
6
10
6
4
60.0%
100.0%
60.0%
40.0%
26 65.0% 125 52.08%
Back to the results
Pair NS2 - Eric Knight & Pauline Knight. Total = 125.0 : 52.08% : 2nd=/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
5
6
7
8
4S
1NT
2S
3S
N
S
W
E
+650
+150
+300
+100
+650
+500
+800
+500
10
2
8
4
100.0%
20.0%
80.0%
40.0%
24 60.0% 24 60.00%
2 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
9
10
11
12
4S
3C
6NT
2NT
E
S
W
E
-680
+110
-1020
-180
-170
+110
-230
-90
3
6
0
0
30.0%
60.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9 22.5% 33 41.25%
4 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
17
18
19
20
6H
2H
1S
2NT
E
E
N
W
+50
-110
+170
+200
+50
+50
+450
+200
10
2
1
7
100.0%
20.0%
10.0%
70.0%
20 50.0% 53 44.17%
5 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
21
22
23
24
4H
3H
4S
2D
N
E
N
W
+620
+200
+620
+100
+650
+200
+620
+100
3
10
6
10
30.0%
100.0%
60.0%
100.0%
29 72.5% 82 51.25%
6 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
25
26
27
28
1H
3S
5Cx
3NT
N
W
N
W
+110
-140
-100
-400
+200
+200
-100
+50
6
1
10
8
60.0%
10.0%
100.0%
80.0%
25 62.5% 107 53.50%
7 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
1
2
3
4
4C
3S
6H
2H
N
S
N
N
-50
+170
-50
-100
+510
+620
+460
-100
6
3
1
8
60.0%
30.0%
10.0%
80.0%
18 45.0% 125 52.08%
Back to the results
Pair NS3 - Jacqui Graham & John Graham. Total = 123.0 : 51.25% : 4th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
9
10
11
12
4S
2C
3NT
2D
E
S
E
W
-680
+90
-490
-110
-170
+110
-230
-90
3
0
8
5
30.0%
0.0%
80.0%
50.0%
16 40.0% 16 40.00%
2 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
2H
4H
S
E
W
W
+620
+100
-140
-680
+620
+100
+50
+140
6
10
5
2
60.0%
100.0%
50.0%
20.0%
23 57.5% 39 48.75%
3 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
17
18
19
20
4H
2H
4S
4H
E
E
N
W
-450
-110
+450
+100
+50
+50
+450
+200
2
2
10
1
20.0%
20.0%
100.0%
10.0%
15 37.5% 54 45.00%
5 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
25
26
27
28
1H
3H
3S
4S
N
E
W
W
-50
+100
-200
-420
+200
+200
-100
+50
1
7
8
4
10.0%
70.0%
80.0%
40.0%
20 50.0% 74 46.25%
6 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
1
2
3
4
4C
4S
3NT
1NT
N
S
N
S
+130
+620
+460
-100
+510
+620
+460
-100
8
9
10
8
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
80.0%
35 87.5% 109 54.50%
7 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
5
6
7
8
3NT
3C
2H
3H
N
N
E
N
-200
-50
+200
+170
+650
+500
+800
+500
1
0
5
8
10.0%
0.0%
50.0%
80.0%
14 35.0% 123 51.25%
Back to the results
Pair NS4 - Ted Murdoch & Hayden Dando. Total = 112.0 : 46.67% : 5th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
13
14
15
16
4S
3D
4H
3S
S
W
W
S
+620
+50
+50
-50
+620
+100
+50
+140
6
6
9
8
60.0%
60.0%
90.0%
80.0%
29 72.5% 29 72.50%
2 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
17
18
19
20
5H
2H
1S
3NT
E
E
N
W
-450
-110
+170
+200
+50
+50
+450
+200
2
2
1
7
20.0%
20.0%
10.0%
70.0%
12 30.0% 41 51.25%
3 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
21
22
23
24
4H
3C
4S
2D
N
S
N
W
+620
-100
+620
-90
+650
+200
+620
+100
3
6
6
3
30.0%
60.0%
60.0%
30.0%
18 45.0% 59 49.17%
4 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
25
26
27
28
1H
2H
4S
4S
N
E
W
W
+110
-140
-450
-420
+200
+200
-100
+50
6
1
1
4
60.0%
10.0%
10.0%
40.0%
12 30.0% 71 44.38%
6 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
5
6
7
8
3NT
3H
3C
4Sx
N
E
W
E
-100
+200
+100
+500
+650
+500
+800
+500
4
4
0
10
40.0%
40.0%
0.0%
100.0%
18 45.0% 89 44.50%
7 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
9
10
11
12
3S
2C
4S
3D
W
S
W
E
-230
+110
-510
-110
-170
+110
-230
-90
8
6
4
5
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
50.0%
23 57.5% 112 46.67%
Back to the results
Pair NS5 - Pauline Hall & Linda Davison. Total = 107.0 : 44.58% : 6th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
17
18
19
20
4H
2H
4S
3H
E
E
N
W
-450
+50
+420
+100
+50
+50
+450
+200
2
10
7
1
20.0%
100.0%
70.0%
10.0%
20 50.0% 20 50.00%
2 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
21
22
23
24
1NT
3D
4S
1NT
S
E
N
W
+180
-110
+620
-120
+650
+200
+620
+100
0
4
6
0
0.0%
40.0%
60.0%
0.0%
10 25.0% 30 37.50%
3 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
25
26
27
28
3D
2H
4S
4S
E
E
E
W
+200
-110
-420
-480
+200
+200
-100
+50
10
4
4
0
100.0%
40.0%
40.0%
0.0%
18 45.0% 48 40.00%
4 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
1
2
3
4
2S
4S
5H
2H
W
S
S
N
-110
+620
+450
-200
+510
+620
+460
-100
3
9
6
2
30.0%
90.0%
60.0%
20.0%
20 50.0% 68 42.50%
5 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
5
6
7
8
3NT
2NT
2H
3S
N
W
E
E
-200
+500
+200
+50
+650
+500
+800
+500
1
10
5
2
10.0%
100.0%
50.0%
20.0%
18 45.0% 86 43.00%
7 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
4H
3D
S
E
W
E
-100
+50
+50
-150
+620
+100
+50
+140
0
6
9
6
0.0%
60.0%
90.0%
60.0%
21 52.5% 107 44.58%
Back to the results
Pair NS6 - Roger Chappel & Brian Hooper. Total = 92.0 : 38.33% : 7th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
21
22
23
24
3NT
3H
3NT
2D
N
E
N
W
+630
-140
-100
-90
+650
+200
+620
+100
7
2
0
3
70.0%
20.0%
0.0%
30.0%
12 30.0% 12 30.00%
2 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
25
26
27
28
4S
3NT
4S
4S
N
W
E
W
-50
+100
-450
+50
+200
+200
-100
+50
1
7
1
10
10.0%
70.0%
10.0%
100.0%
19 47.5% 31 38.75%
3 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
1
2
3
4
2S
3S
5H
2H
W
S
S
N
-110
+170
+450
-200
+510
+620
+460
-100
3
3
6
2
30.0%
30.0%
60.0%
20.0%
14 35.0% 45 37.50%
4 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
5
6
7
8
2C
4H
2D
4H
S
E
S
S
+110
+300
+110
-150
+650
+500
+800
+500
6
6
2
0
60.0%
60.0%
20.0%
0.0%
14 35.0% 59 36.88%
5 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
9
10
11
12
4S
2C
4S
3D
E
S
W
W
-620
+110
-510
-110
-170
+110
-230
-90
6
6
4
5
60.0%
60.0%
40.0%
50.0%
21 52.5% 80 40.00%
6 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
2H
4Sx
S
E
W
S
+620
-480
-170
-300
+620
+100
+50
+140
6
0
2
4
60.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
12 30.0% 92 38.33%
Back to the results
Pair NS7 - Peter Williams & David Mills. Total = 156.0 : 65.00% : 1st/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
2 Louise Badcock
& John Gray
1
2
3
4
3S
3S
4H
1NT
E
N
S
S
-140
+170
+450
-100
+510
+620
+460
-100
0
3
6
8
0.0%
30.0%
60.0%
80.0%
17 42.5% 17 42.50%
3 Mike Brennan &
Beverley Marriner
5
6
7
8
3NT
4H
2Sx
4S
N
E
E
E
+600
+400
+800
+150
+650
+500
+800
+500
8
8
10
6
80.0%
80.0%
100.0%
60.0%
32 80.0% 49 61.25%
4 Grace Hunter &
Jennifer Wilson
9
10
11
12
3D
2C
3S
1NT
E
S
W
W
-170
+110
-230
-90
-170
+110
-230
-90
10
6
10
10
100.0%
60.0%
100.0%
100.0%
36 90.0% 85 70.83%
5 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
13
14
15
16
4S
4Sx
2H
3S
S
S
W
S
+620
-300
-140
+140
+620
+100
+50
+140
6
2
5
10
60.0%
20.0%
50.0%
100.0%
23 57.5% 108 67.50%
6 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
17
18
19
20
3H
3S
4S
4H
E
N
N
W
-200
-100
+420
+200
+50
+50
+450
+200
6
7
7
7
60.0%
70.0%
70.0%
70.0%
27 67.5% 135 67.50%
7 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Bev Godfrey
21
22
23
24
3NT
5Cx
4S
4S
N
S
N
E
+630
-500
+620
+50
+650
+200
+620
+100
7
0
6
8
70.0%
0.0%
60.0%
80.0%
21 52.5% 156 65.00%
Back to the results
Pair EW1 - Nichola Cockerill-Smith & Bev Godfrey. Total = 177.0 : 63.21% : 1st/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
1
2
3
4
4Cx
3S
6NT
2H
N
S
N
N
-510
-170
+50
+200
+140
-170
+50
+200
0
7
9
8
0.0%
70.0%
90.0%
80.0%
24 60.0% 24 60.00%
2 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
9
10
11
12
4S
3C
6NT
2NT
E
S
W
E
+680
-110
+1020
+180
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
7
4
10
10
70.0%
40.0%
100.0%
100.0%
31 77.5% 55 68.75%
3 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
17
18
19
20
4H
2H
4S
4H
E
E
N
W
+450
+110
-450
-100
+450
+110
-170
-100
8
8
0
9
80.0%
80.0%
0.0%
90.0%
25 62.5% 80 66.67%
4 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
25
26
27
28
1H
2H
4S
4S
N
E
W
W
-110
+140
+450
+420
+50
+140
+450
+480
4
9
9
6
40.0%
90.0%
90.0%
60.0%
28 70.0% 108 67.50%
5 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
5
6
7
8
3NT
2NT
2H
3S
N
W
E
E
+200
-500
-200
-50
+200
+50
-100
+150
9
0
5
8
90.0%
0.0%
50.0%
80.0%
22 55.0% 130 65.00%
6 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
2H
4Sx
S
E
W
S
-620
+480
+170
+300
+100
+480
+420
+750
4
10
8
6
40.0%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
28 70.0% 158 65.83%
7 Peter Williams
& David Mills
21
22
23
24
3NT
5Cx
4S
4S
N
S
N
E
-630
+500
-620
-50
-180
+500
+100
+120
3
10
4
2
30.0%
100.0%
40.0%
20.0%
19 47.5% 177 63.21%
Back to the results
Pair EW2 - Joan Stenson & Liz Robinson. Total = 121.0 : 43.21% : 5th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
5
6
7
8
4S
1NT
2S
3S
N
S
W
E
-650
-150
-300
-100
+200
+50
-100
+150
0
8
2
6
0.0%
80.0%
20.0%
60.0%
16 40.0% 16 40.00%
2 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
2H
4H
S
E
W
W
-620
-100
+140
+680
+100
+480
+420
+750
4
0
5
8
40.0%
0.0%
50.0%
80.0%
17 42.5% 33 41.25%
3 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
21
22
23
24
4H
3C
4S
2D
N
S
N
W
-620
+100
-620
+90
-180
+500
+100
+120
7
4
4
7
70.0%
40.0%
40.0%
70.0%
22 55.0% 55 45.83%
4 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
1
2
3
4
2S
4S
5H
2H
W
S
S
N
+110
-620
-450
+200
+140
-170
+50
+200
7
1
4
8
70.0%
10.0%
40.0%
80.0%
20 50.0% 75 46.88%
5 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
9
10
11
12
4S
2C
4S
3D
E
S
W
W
+620
-110
+510
+110
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
4
4
6
5
40.0%
40.0%
60.0%
50.0%
19 47.5% 94 47.00%
6 Peter Williams
& David Mills
17
18
19
20
3H
3S
4S
4H
E
N
N
W
+200
+100
-420
-200
+450
+110
-170
-100
4
3
3
3
40.0%
30.0%
30.0%
30.0%
13 32.5% 107 44.58%
7 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
25
26
27
28
1H
3Hx
5Cx
4S
N
E
N
W
-110
-200
+300
+420
+50
+140
+450
+480
4
0
4
6
40.0%
0.0%
40.0%
60.0%
14 35.0% 121 43.21%
Back to the results
Pair EW3 - Barbara Stott & Fred Aitken. Total = 149.0 : 53.21% : 3rd/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
9
10
11
12
4S
2C
3NT
2D
E
S
E
W
+680
-90
+490
+110
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
7
10
2
5
70.0%
100.0%
20.0%
50.0%
24 60.0% 24 60.00%
2 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
17
18
19
20
5H
2H
1S
3NT
E
E
N
W
+450
+110
-170
-200
+450
+110
-170
-100
8
8
9
3
80.0%
80.0%
90.0%
30.0%
28 70.0% 52 65.00%
3 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
25
26
27
28
3D
2H
4S
4S
E
E
E
W
-200
+110
+420
+480
+50
+140
+450
+480
0
6
6
10
0.0%
60.0%
60.0%
100.0%
22 55.0% 74 61.67%
4 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
5
6
7
8
2C
4H
2D
4H
S
E
S
S
-110
-300
-110
+150
+200
+50
-100
+150
4
4
8
10
40.0%
40.0%
80.0%
100.0%
26 65.0% 100 62.50%
5 Peter Williams
& David Mills
13
14
15
16
4S
4Sx
2H
3S
S
S
W
S
-620
+300
+140
-140
+100
+480
+420
+750
4
8
5
0
40.0%
80.0%
50.0%
0.0%
17 42.5% 117 58.50%
6 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
21
22
23
24
4H
3C
4S
2H
N
S
N
S
-650
-110
-620
+50
-180
+500
+100
+120
0
2
4
4
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
40.0%
10 25.0% 127 52.92%
7 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
1
2
3
4
4C
3S
6H
2H
N
S
N
N
+50
-170
+50
+100
+140
-170
+50
+200
4
7
9
2
40.0%
70.0%
90.0%
20.0%
22 55.0% 149 53.21%
Back to the results
Pair EW4 - Grace Hunter & Jennifer Wilson. Total = 126.0 : 45.00% : 4th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
13
14
15
16
4S
3D
4H
3S
S
W
W
S
-620
-50
-50
+50
+100
+480
+420
+750
4
4
1
2
40.0%
40.0%
10.0%
20.0%
11 27.5% 11 27.50%
2 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
21
22
23
24
1NT
3D
4S
1NT
S
E
N
W
-180
+110
-620
+120
-180
+500
+100
+120
10
6
4
10
100.0%
60.0%
40.0%
100.0%
30 75.0% 41 51.25%
3 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
1
2
3
4
2S
3S
5H
2H
W
S
S
N
+110
-170
-450
+200
+140
-170
+50
+200
7
7
4
8
70.0%
70.0%
40.0%
80.0%
26 65.0% 67 55.83%
4 Peter Williams
& David Mills
9
10
11
12
3D
2C
3S
1NT
E
S
W
W
+170
-110
+230
+90
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
0
4
0
0
0.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4 10.0% 71 44.38%
5 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
17
18
19
20
6Cx
2S
1S
4H
N
N
N
W
+100
+100
-230
-200
+450
+110
-170
-100
2
3
6
3
20.0%
30.0%
60.0%
30.0%
14 35.0% 85 42.50%
6 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
25
26
27
28
1H
3S
5Cx
3NT
N
W
N
W
-110
+140
+100
+400
+50
+140
+450
+480
4
9
0
2
40.0%
90.0%
0.0%
20.0%
15 37.5% 100 41.67%
7 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
5
6
7
8
3NT
3C
2H
3H
N
N
E
N
+200
+50
-200
-170
+200
+50
-100
+150
9
10
5
2
90.0%
100.0%
50.0%
20.0%
26 65.0% 126 45.00%
Back to the results
Pair EW5 - Mike Brennan & Beverley Marriner. Total = 110.0 : 39.29% : 6th/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
17
18
19
20
4H
2H
4S
3H
E
E
N
W
+450
-50
-420
-100
+450
+110
-170
-100
8
0
3
9
80.0%
0.0%
30.0%
90.0%
20 50.0% 20 50.00%
2 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
25
26
27
28
4S
3NT
4S
4S
N
W
E
W
+50
-100
+450
-50
+50
+140
+450
+480
9
3
9
0
90.0%
30.0%
90.0%
0.0%
21 52.5% 41 51.25%
3 Peter Williams
& David Mills
5
6
7
8
3NT
4H
2Sx
4S
N
E
E
E
-600
-400
-800
-150
+200
+50
-100
+150
2
2
0
4
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
40.0%
8 20.0% 49 40.83%
4 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
4H
5Dx
S
E
W
E
-620
-50
+420
+750
+100
+480
+420
+750
4
4
10
10
40.0%
40.0%
100.0%
100.0%
28 70.0% 77 48.13%
5 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
21
22
23
24
4H
3H
4S
2D
N
E
N
W
-620
-200
-620
-100
-180
+500
+100
+120
7
0
4
0
70.0%
0.0%
40.0%
0.0%
11 27.5% 88 44.00%
6 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
1
2
3
4
4C
4S
3NT
1NT
N
S
N
S
-130
-620
-460
+100
+140
-170
+50
+200
2
1
0
2
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
20.0%
5 12.5% 93 38.75%
7 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
9
10
11
12
3S
2C
4S
3D
W
S
W
E
+230
-110
+510
+110
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
2
4
6
5
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
50.0%
17 42.5% 110 39.29%
Back to the results
Pair EW6 - Louise Badcock & John Gray. Total = 157.0 : 56.07% : 2nd/7 : Top is 10.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Roger Chappel
& Brian Hooper
21
22
23
24
3NT
3H
3NT
2D
N
E
N
W
-630
+140
+100
+90
-180
+500
+100
+120
3
8
10
7
30.0%
80.0%
100.0%
70.0%
28 70.0% 28 70.00%
2 Peter Williams
& David Mills
1
2
3
4
3S
3S
4H
1NT
E
N
S
S
+140
-170
-450
+100
+140
-170
+50
+200
10
7
4
2
100.0%
70.0%
40.0%
20.0%
23 57.5% 51 63.75%
3 Liz Reese &
Bob Watts
9
10
11
12
5Hx
2D
4S
2S
S
S
W
E
+1100
-110
+510
+110
+1100
-90
+1020
+180
10
4
6
5
100.0%
40.0%
60.0%
50.0%
25 62.5% 76 63.33%
4 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
17
18
19
20
6H
2H
1S
2NT
E
E
N
W
-50
+110
-170
-200
+450
+110
-170
-100
0
8
9
3
0.0%
80.0%
90.0%
30.0%
20 50.0% 96 60.00%
5 Jacqui Graham
& John Graham
25
26
27
28
1H
3H
3S
4S
N
E
W
W
+50
-100
+200
+420
+50
+140
+450
+480
9
3
2
6
90.0%
30.0%
20.0%
60.0%
20 50.0% 116 58.00%
6 Ted Murdoch &
Hayden Dando
5
6
7
8
3NT
3H
3C
4Sx
N
E
W
E
+100
-200
-100
-500
+200
+50
-100
+150
6
6
10
0
60.0%
60.0%
100.0%
0.0%
22 55.0% 138 57.50%
7 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
13
14
15
16
4S
4H
4H
3D
S
E
W
E
+100
-50
-50
+150
+100
+480
+420
+750
10
4
1
4
100.0%
40.0%
10.0%
40.0%
19 47.5% 157 56.07%