Hurworth Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Elsie Bell Trophy round 6 - May 31, 2017

9 tables - Mitchell

Back to the results
Pair NS1 - Nigel Durie & David Turner. Total = 238.0 : 55.09% : 1st/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
E
S
-120
-400
+450
-90
-120
+450
6
7
15
37.5%
43.8%
93.8%
28 58.3% 28 58.33%
2 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
4
5
6
3Hx
3NT
2S
W
E
E
+800
-490
+200
+800
-150
+300
16
0
8
100.0%
0.0%
50.0%
24 50.0% 52 54.17%
3 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
7
8
9
3H
4S
3D
N
S
W
+170
-50
-110
+620
+200
-100
12
6
13
75.0%
37.5%
81.3%
31 64.6% 83 57.64%
4 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
10
11
12
2H
4D
Pass
S
E
 
+140
-130
Pass
+300
+800
+620
10
0
4
62.5%
0.0%
25.0%
14 29.2% 97 50.52%
5 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
13
14
15
5H
5D
4H
N
S
N
-100
+400
+680
+800
+400
+680
0
15
16
0.0%
93.8%
100.0%
31 64.6% 128 53.33%
6 Val Gibson
& Bill March
16
17
18
2H
4S
 
S
W
 
-100
+100
Ave
+110
+480
+150
2
10
8
12.5%
62.5%
50.0%
20 41.7% 148 51.39%
7 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
19
20
21
3H
5S
4D
W
S
E
-200
+650
+50
-170
+650
+200
9
9
8
56.3%
56.3%
50.0%
26 54.2% 174 51.79%
8 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
22
23
24
4H
3H
2H
S
W
S
+450
-170
+110
+450
+200
+110
9
0
16
56.3%
0.0%
100.0%
25 52.1% 199 51.82%
9 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
25
26
27
4H
5S
3Cx
N
E
W
+450
-680
+300
+500
-680
+300
13
10
16
81.3%
62.5%
100.0%
39 81.3% 238 55.09%
Back to the results
Pair NS2 - Pauline Durie & Audrey Bainbridge. Total = 232.3 : 53.76% : 3rd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
4
5
6
2H
3NT
1NTx
W
E
W
-140
-430
+200
+800
-150
+300
3
4
8
18.8%
25.0%
50.0%
15 31.3% 15 31.25%
2 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
7
8
9
4S
2S
2D
S
S
W
+620
+110
-130
+620
+200
-100
15
10
9
93.8%
62.5%
56.3%
34 70.8% 49 51.04%
3 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
10
11
12
2H
4H
2H
S
S
N
+110
-50
+140
+300
+800
+620
7
3
10
43.8%
18.8%
62.5%
20 41.7% 69 47.92%
4 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
13
14
15
5Cx
4S
4H
W
S
S
+800
-100
+650
+800
+400
+680
16
5
11
100.0%
31.3%
68.8%
32 66.7% 101 52.60%
5 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
16
17
18
1H
4H
2D
S
S
E
+110
+480
-110
+110
+480
+150
13
16
10.3
81.3%
100.0%
64.1%
39.3 81.8% 140.3 58.44%
6 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
19
20
21
3H
4S
3H
W
S
S
-170
+650
+140
-170
+650
+200
14
9
12
87.5%
56.3%
75.0%
35 72.9% 175.3 60.85%
7 Val Gibson
& Bill March
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
W
+450
-140
+50
+450
+200
+110
9
4
10
56.3%
25.0%
62.5%
23 47.9% 198.3 59.00%
8 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
25
26
27
4H
6NT
4Dx
S
E
S
+420
-1440
-800
+500
-680
+300
9
1
0
56.3%
6.3%
0.0%
10 20.8% 208.3 54.23%
9 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
E
S
-120
-400
+420
-90
-120
+450
6
7
11
37.5%
43.8%
68.8%
24 50.0% 232.3 53.76%
Back to the results
Pair NS3 - Keith McCarthy & Alison McCarthy. Total = 185.9 : 43.03% : 9th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
7
8
9
4H
4S
4C
N
S
N
-200
-50
-150
+620
+200
-100
4
6
3
25.0%
37.5%
18.8%
13 27.1% 13 27.08%
2 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
10
11
12
1NT
4D
3S
E
E
E
-120
+100
-140
+300
+800
+620
2
7
1
12.5%
43.8%
6.3%
10 20.8% 23 23.96%
3 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
13
14
15
4C
4Hx
4H
W
W
S
+100
+100
+620
+800
+400
+680
2
10
5
12.5%
62.5%
31.3%
17 35.4% 40 27.78%
4 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
16
17
18
4H
4H
3NT
S
S
E
-150
+420
+150
+110
+480
+150
0
14
15.9
0.0%
87.5%
99.2%
29.9 62.2% 69.9 36.39%
5 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
19
20
21
3H
6S
2H
W
S
S
-170
-200
+140
-170
+650
+200
14
0
12
87.5%
0.0%
75.0%
26 54.2% 95.9 39.95%
6 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
22
23
24
4H
3H
1NT
S
W
S
+450
+100
+90
+450
+200
+110
9
13
13
56.3%
81.3%
81.3%
35 72.9% 130.9 45.44%
7 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
25
26
27
3D
6NT
2S
W
W
W
+100
-1440
-140
+500
-680
+300
0
1
10
0.0%
6.3%
62.5%
11 22.9% 141.9 42.22%
8 Val Gibson
& Bill March
1
2
3
1NT
1NT
4H
E
E
S
-90
-150
-50
-90
-120
+450
14
12
3
87.5%
75.0%
18.8%
29 60.4% 170.9 44.50%
9 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
4
5
6
2H
3NT
3C
W
E
W
-140
-430
+200
+800
-150
+300
3
4
8
18.8%
25.0%
50.0%
15 31.3% 185.9 43.03%
Back to the results
Pair NS4 - Jean Hattersley & Michael Hatton. Total = 217.1 : 50.26% : 5th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
10
11
12
1NT
3S
3D
E
E
W
+300
+100
+150
+300
+800
+620
15
7
12
93.8%
43.8%
75.0%
34 70.8% 34 70.83%
2 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
13
14
15
5Cx
5H
3H
W
W
S
+500
+150
+170
+800
+400
+680
8
12
2
50.0%
75.0%
12.5%
22 45.8% 56 58.33%
3 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
16
17
18
2H
4S
4H
S
E
E
-50
+50
-450
+110
+480
+150
4
6
0.1
25.0%
37.5%
0.8%
10.1 21.1% 66.1 45.92%
4 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
19
20
21
4H
5S
4H
W
S
S
-620
+650
-100
-170
+650
+200
5
9
3
31.3%
56.3%
18.8%
17 35.4% 83.1 43.29%
5 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
22
23
24
4H
4H
1NT
S
W
S
+450
+200
-50
+450
+200
+110
9
16
6
56.3%
100.0%
37.5%
31 64.6% 114.1 47.55%
6 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
25
26
27
4Cx
4S
1NT
E
E
W
+500
-680
-120
+500
-680
+300
16
10
12
100.0%
62.5%
75.0%
38 79.2% 152.1 52.82%
7 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
Pass
E
W
 
-150
-430
Pass
-90
-120
+450
0
2
6
0.0%
12.5%
37.5%
8 16.7% 160.1 47.66%
8 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
-110
-150
+200
+800
-150
+300
7
15
8
43.8%
93.8%
50.0%
30 62.5% 190.1 49.51%
9 Val Gibson
& Bill March
7
8
9
4H
3S
2D
N
S
W
-200
+170
-130
+620
+200
-100
4
14
9
25.0%
87.5%
56.3%
27 56.3% 217.1 50.26%
Back to the results
Pair NS5 - Bob Watts & Liz Reese. Total = 209.4 : 48.47% : 7th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Val Gibson
& Bill March
13
14
15
4H
5D
4H
N
N
S
+680
+400
+650
+800
+400
+680
12
15
11
75.0%
93.8%
68.8%
38 79.2% 38 79.17%
2 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
16
17
18
2C
4Sx
3S
S
W
S
+90
+100
-300
+110
+480
+150
6
10
2.4
37.5%
62.5%
14.8%
18.4 38.3% 56.4 58.72%
3 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
19
20
21
4H
4S
4H
E
S
S
-650
+650
-100
-170
+650
+200
2
9
3
12.5%
56.3%
18.8%
14 29.2% 70.4 48.87%
4 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
S
+450
-140
-150
+450
+200
+110
9
4
0
56.3%
25.0%
0.0%
13 27.1% 83.4 43.42%
5 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
25
26
27
4H
4S
2H
N
E
S
+450
-680
-150
+500
-680
+300
13
10
8
81.3%
62.5%
50.0%
31 64.6% 114.4 47.66%
6 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
1
2
3
1NT
2NT
4H
E
E
S
-90
-180
-50
-90
-120
+450
14
10
3
87.5%
62.5%
18.8%
27 56.3% 141.4 49.09%
7 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
4
5
6
3S
5D
2S
S
E
E
-200
-420
+200
+800
-150
+300
0
9
8
0.0%
56.3%
50.0%
17 35.4% 158.4 47.14%
8 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
7
8
9
3S
3Hx
3C
S
E
N
+140
-530
-100
+620
+200
-100
10
0
16
62.5%
0.0%
100.0%
26 54.2% 184.4 48.01%
9 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
10
11
12
3C
3S
3S
W
W
E
+100
+150
+50
+300
+800
+620
4
14
7
25.0%
87.5%
43.8%
25 52.1% 209.4 48.47%
Back to the results
Pair NS6 - Julian Gibson & Hayden Dando. Total = 233.6 : 54.08% : 2nd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
16
17
18
2H
4H
2S
S
S
N
+110
-50
-100
+110
+480
+150
13
3
13.6
81.3%
18.8%
85.2%
29.6 61.7% 29.6 61.72%
2 Val Gibson
& Bill March
19
20
21
4H
5S
4H
W
S
S
-620
+650
-100
-170
+650
+200
5
9
3
31.3%
56.3%
18.8%
17 35.4% 46.6 48.57%
3 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
22
23
24
4H
Pass
1NT
S
 
S
+450
Pass
-100
+450
+200
+110
9
10
2
56.3%
62.5%
12.5%
21 43.8% 67.6 46.96%
4 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
25
26
27
4H
4S
1NT
N
E
W
+420
-680
-90
+500
-680
+300
9
10
14
56.3%
62.5%
87.5%
33 68.8% 100.6 52.41%
5 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
W
S
-120
-430
+450
-90
-120
+450
6
2
15
37.5%
12.5%
93.8%
23 47.9% 123.6 51.51%
6 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
4
5
6
1NT
5D
2S
N
E
E
+90
-420
+200
+800
-150
+300
12
9
8
75.0%
56.3%
50.0%
29 60.4% 152.6 52.99%
7 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
7
8
9
4H
3S
2NT
N
S
E
-100
+200
-150
+620
+200
-100
8
16
3
50.0%
100.0%
18.8%
27 56.3% 179.6 53.46%
8 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
10
11
12
2H
3H
4H
S
S
N
+110
+140
+620
+300
+800
+620
7
11
16
43.8%
68.8%
100.0%
34 70.8% 213.6 55.63%
9 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
13
14
15
4H
4S
4H
N
S
S
+620
-100
+620
+800
+400
+680
10
5
5
62.5%
31.3%
31.3%
20 41.7% 233.6 54.08%
Back to the results
Pair NS7 - Chris Johnson & John Millman. Total = 194.6 : 45.05% : 8th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
19
20
21
3H
4S
3H
W
S
S
-170
+650
+140
-170
+650
+200
14
9
12
87.5%
56.3%
75.0%
35 72.9% 35 72.92%
2 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
N
+450
-110
+90
+450
+200
+110
9
8
13
56.3%
50.0%
81.3%
30 62.5% 65 67.71%
3 Val Gibson
& Bill March
25
26
27
3S
4S
1NT
S
E
W
+170
-680
-180
+500
-680
+300
2
10
3
12.5%
62.5%
18.8%
15 31.3% 80 55.56%
4 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
3H
E
E
S
-120
-430
+140
-90
-120
+450
6
2
8
37.5%
12.5%
50.0%
16 33.3% 96 50.00%
5 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
+100
-150
+200
+800
-150
+300
14
15
8
87.5%
93.8%
50.0%
37 77.1% 133 55.42%
6 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
7
8
9
3NT
3NT
3H
N
N
W
-300
-150
-140
+620
+200
-100
0
2
6
0.0%
12.5%
37.5%
8 16.7% 141 48.96%
7 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
10
11
12
4H
4H
3H
S
S
N
-200
-50
+170
+300
+800
+620
0
3
14
0.0%
18.8%
87.5%
17 35.4% 158 47.02%
8 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
13
14
15
5C
4S
4H
W
S
N
+200
-100
+650
+800
+400
+680
5
5
11
31.3%
31.3%
68.8%
21 43.8% 179 46.61%
9 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
16
17
18
1S
3H
2H
E
N
E
+100
-50
-140
+110
+480
+150
8
3
4.6
50.0%
18.8%
28.9%
15.6 32.6% 194.6 45.05%
Back to the results
Pair NS8 - Ted Murdoch & Eddie Nord. Total = 211.9 : 49.05% : 6th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
22
23
24
6H
3H
1NT
S
W
N
-50
-140
-50
+450
+200
+110
0
4
6
0.0%
25.0%
37.5%
10 20.8% 10 20.83%
2 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
25
26
27
3S
4S
2S
S
E
W
+200
-680
-170
+500
-680
+300
5
10
6
31.3%
62.5%
37.5%
21 43.8% 31 32.29%
3 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
1
2
3
1NT
1NT
4H
E
E
S
-90
-120
-150
-90
-120
+450
14
16
0
87.5%
100.0%
0.0%
30 62.5% 61 42.36%
4 Val Gibson
& Bill March
4
5
6
2NT
3NT
3D
N
E
S
-100
-430
-50
+800
-150
+300
10
4
0
62.5%
25.0%
0.0%
14 29.2% 75 39.06%
5 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
7
8
9
4H
4S
3NT
N
S
E
+620
-50
-600
+620
+200
-100
15
6
0
93.8%
37.5%
0.0%
21 43.8% 96 40.00%
6 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
10
11
12
3H
5Dx
3S
S
E
E
+170
+800
+50
+300
+800
+620
12
16
7
75.0%
100.0%
43.8%
35 72.9% 131 45.49%
7 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
13
14
15
4Hx
4S
5H
N
S
S
+790
-100
+650
+800
+400
+680
14
5
11
87.5%
31.3%
68.8%
30 62.5% 161 47.92%
8 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
16
17
18
1H
4Sx
3C
S
W
W
+110
+100
-130
+110
+480
+150
13
10
6.9
81.3%
62.5%
43.0%
29.9 62.2% 190.9 49.71%
9 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
19
20
21
3S
5S
4H
N
S
S
-200
+650
-100
-170
+650
+200
9
9
3
56.3%
56.3%
18.8%
21 43.8% 211.9 49.05%
Back to the results
Pair NS9 - Margaret Johnson & Christine Bainbridge. Total = 221.3 : 51.22% : 4th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Josephine Finney
& Eileen Cotton
25
26
27
5C
4S
1NT
E
E
W
+200
-680
-180
+500
-680
+300
5
10
3
31.3%
62.5%
18.8%
18 37.5% 18 37.50%
2 Jennifer Wilson
& John Lambert
1
2
3
1NT
2D
4H
E
W
S
-120
-130
+420
-90
-120
+450
6
14
11
37.5%
87.5%
68.8%
31 64.6% 49 51.04%
3 Roger Chappel
& Kevin Connolly
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
-110
-170
+300
+800
-150
+300
7
12
16
43.8%
75.0%
100.0%
35 72.9% 84 58.33%
4 Grace Hunter
& Chris Hope
7
8
9
4H
2S
3D
N
S
W
-200
+140
-110
+620
+200
-100
4
12
13
25.0%
75.0%
81.3%
29 60.4% 113 58.85%
5 Val Gibson
& Bill March
10
11
12
1NT
2H
3S
E
S
E
+300
+140
-140
+300
+800
+620
15
11
1
93.8%
68.8%
6.3%
27 56.3% 140 58.33%
6 George Kellett
& Joe Bateman
13
14
15
5Cx
5Hx
5H
W
W
N
+200
-650
-100
+800
+400
+680
5
0
0
31.3%
0.0%
0.0%
5 10.4% 145 50.35%
7 John Faichney &
Derek Bainbridge
16
17
18
1H
2S
2D
S
W
E
+110
-140
-110
+110
+480
+150
13
0
10.3
81.3%
0.0%
64.1%
23.3 48.4% 168.3 50.07%
8 Nichola Cockerill-Smith
& Jenny Grist
19
20
21
4H
4S
4D
W
S
E
-680
+650
+200
-170
+650
+200
0
9
16
0.0%
56.3%
100.0%
25 52.1% 193.3 50.33%
9 Peter Burnip
& Rose Boddy
22
23
24
5H
4H
1NT
S
W
S
+450
+100
-50
+450
+200
+110
9
13
6
56.3%
81.3%
37.5%
28 58.3% 221.3 51.22%
Back to the results
Pair EW1 - Peter Burnip & Rose Boddy. Total = 201.1 : 46.56% : 6th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
E
S
+120
+400
-450
+150
+430
+150
10
9
1
62.5%
56.3%
6.3%
20 41.7% 20 41.67%
2 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
7
8
9
4S
2S
2D
S
S
W
-620
-110
+130
+300
+530
+600
1
6
7
6.3%
37.5%
43.8%
14 29.2% 34 35.42%
3 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
13
14
15
4C
4Hx
4H
W
W
S
-100
-100
-620
+100
+650
+100
14
6
11
87.5%
37.5%
68.8%
31 64.6% 65 45.14%
4 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
19
20
21
4H
5S
4H
W
S
S
+620
-650
+100
+680
+200
+100
11
7
13
68.8%
43.8%
81.3%
31 64.6% 96 50.00%
5 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
25
26
27
4H
4S
2H
N
E
S
-450
+680
+150
-100
+1440
+800
3
6
8
18.8%
37.5%
50.0%
17 35.4% 113 47.08%
6 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
4
5
6
1NT
5D
2S
N
E
E
-90
+420
-200
+200
+490
+50
4
7
8
25.0%
43.8%
50.0%
19 39.6% 132 45.83%
7 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
10
11
12
4H
4H
3H
S
S
N
+200
+50
-170
+200
+130
+140
16
13
2
100.0%
81.3%
12.5%
31 64.6% 163 48.51%
8 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
16
17
18
1H
4Sx
3C
S
W
W
-110
-100
+130
+150
+140
+450
3
6
9.1
18.8%
37.5%
57.0%
18.1 37.8% 181.1 47.17%
9 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
22
23
24
5H
4H
1NT
S
W
S
-450
-100
+50
+50
+170
+150
7
3
10
43.8%
18.8%
62.5%
20 41.7% 201.1 46.56%
Back to the results
Pair EW2 - Nichola Cockerill-Smith & Jenny Grist. Total = 258.9 : 59.92% : 2nd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
4
5
6
2H
3NT
1NTx
W
E
W
+140
+430
-200
+200
+490
+50
13
12
8
81.3%
75.0%
50.0%
33 68.8% 33 68.75%
2 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
10
11
12
1NT
4D
3S
E
E
E
+120
-100
+140
+200
+130
+140
14
9
15
87.5%
56.3%
93.8%
38 79.2% 71 73.96%
3 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
16
17
18
2H
4S
4H
S
E
E
+50
-50
+450
+150
+140
+450
12
10
15.9
75.0%
62.5%
99.2%
37.9 78.9% 108.9 75.61%
4 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
S
-450
+140
+150
+50
+170
+150
7
12
16
43.8%
75.0%
100.0%
35 72.9% 143.9 74.93%
5 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
W
S
+120
+430
-450
+150
+430
+150
10
14
1
62.5%
87.5%
6.3%
25 52.1% 168.9 70.36%
6 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
7
8
9
3NT
3NT
3H
N
N
W
+300
+150
+140
+300
+530
+600
16
14
10
100.0%
87.5%
62.5%
40 83.3% 208.9 72.53%
7 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
13
14
15
4Hx
4S
5H
N
S
S
-790
+100
-650
+100
+650
+100
2
11
5
12.5%
68.8%
31.3%
18 37.5% 226.9 67.52%
8 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
19
20
21
4H
4S
4D
W
S
E
+680
-650
-200
+680
+200
+100
16
7
0
100.0%
43.8%
0.0%
23 47.9% 249.9 65.07%
9 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
25
26
27
4H
5S
3Cx
N
E
W
-450
+680
-300
-100
+1440
+800
3
6
0
18.8%
37.5%
0.0%
9 18.8% 258.9 59.92%
Back to the results
Pair EW3 - John Faichney & Derek Bainbridge. Total = 205.8 : 47.63% : 5th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
7
8
9
4H
4S
4C
N
S
N
+200
+50
+150
+300
+530
+600
12
10
13
75.0%
62.5%
81.3%
35 72.9% 35 72.92%
2 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
13
14
15
5Cx
5H
3H
W
W
S
-500
-150
-170
+100
+650
+100
8
4
14
50.0%
25.0%
87.5%
26 54.2% 61 63.54%
3 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
19
20
21
4H
4S
4H
E
S
S
+650
-650
+100
+680
+200
+100
14
7
13
87.5%
43.8%
81.3%
34 70.8% 95 65.97%
4 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
25
26
27
4H
4S
1NT
N
E
W
-420
+680
+90
-100
+1440
+800
7
6
2
43.8%
37.5%
12.5%
15 31.3% 110 57.29%
5 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
-100
+150
-200
+200
+490
+50
2
1
8
12.5%
6.3%
50.0%
11 22.9% 121 50.42%
6 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
10
11
12
3H
5Dx
3S
S
E
E
-170
-800
-50
+200
+130
+140
4
0
9
25.0%
0.0%
56.3%
13 27.1% 134 46.53%
7 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
16
17
18
1H
2S
2D
S
W
E
-110
+140
+110
+150
+140
+450
3
16
5.8
18.8%
100.0%
35.9%
24.8 51.6% 158.8 47.25%
8 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
22
23
24
4H
3H
2H
S
W
S
-450
+170
-110
+50
+170
+150
7
16
0
43.8%
100.0%
0.0%
23 47.9% 181.8 47.33%
9 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
4H
E
E
S
+120
+400
-420
+150
+430
+150
10
9
5
62.5%
56.3%
31.3%
24 50.0% 205.8 47.63%
Back to the results
Pair EW4 - George Kellett & Joe Bateman. Total = 265.6 : 61.49% : 1st/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
10
11
12
1NT
3S
3D
E
E
W
-300
-100
-150
+200
+130
+140
1
9
4
6.3%
56.3%
25.0%
14 29.2% 14 29.17%
2 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
16
17
18
2C
4Sx
3S
S
W
S
-90
-100
+300
+150
+140
+450
10
6
13.6
62.5%
37.5%
85.2%
29.6 61.7% 43.6 45.44%
3 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
22
23
24
4H
Pass
1NT
S
 
S
-450
Pass
+100
+50
+170
+150
7
6
14
43.8%
37.5%
87.5%
27 56.3% 70.6 49.05%
4 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
3H
E
E
S
+120
+430
-140
+150
+430
+150
10
14
8
62.5%
87.5%
50.0%
32 66.7% 102.6 53.45%
5 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
7
8
9
4H
4S
3NT
N
S
E
-620
+50
+600
+300
+530
+600
1
10
16
6.3%
62.5%
100.0%
27 56.3% 129.6 54.01%
6 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
13
14
15
5Cx
5Hx
5H
W
W
N
-200
+650
+100
+100
+650
+100
11
16
16
68.8%
100.0%
100.0%
43 89.6% 172.6 59.94%
7 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
19
20
21
3H
5S
4D
W
S
E
+200
-650
-50
+680
+200
+100
7
7
8
43.8%
43.8%
50.0%
22 45.8% 194.6 57.92%
8 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
25
26
27
4H
6NT
4Dx
S
E
S
-420
+1440
+800
-100
+1440
+800
7
15
16
43.8%
93.8%
100.0%
38 79.2% 232.6 60.58%
9 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
4
5
6
2H
3NT
3C
W
E
W
+140
+430
-200
+200
+490
+50
13
12
8
81.3%
75.0%
50.0%
33 68.8% 265.6 61.49%
Back to the results
Pair EW5 - Val Gibson & Bill March. Total = 222.0 : 51.39% : 3rd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
13
14
15
4H
5D
4H
N
N
S
-680
-400
-650
+100
+650
+100
4
1
5
25.0%
6.3%
31.3%
10 20.8% 10 20.83%
2 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
19
20
21
4H
5S
4H
W
S
S
+620
-650
+100
+680
+200
+100
11
7
13
68.8%
43.8%
81.3%
31 64.6% 41 42.71%
3 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
25
26
27
3S
4S
1NT
S
E
W
-170
+680
+180
-100
+1440
+800
14
6
13
87.5%
37.5%
81.3%
33 68.8% 74 51.39%
4 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
4
5
6
2NT
3NT
3D
N
E
S
+100
+430
+50
+200
+490
+50
6
12
16
37.5%
75.0%
100.0%
34 70.8% 108 56.25%
5 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
10
11
12
1NT
2H
3S
E
S
E
-300
-140
+140
+200
+130
+140
1
5
15
6.3%
31.3%
93.8%
21 43.8% 129 53.75%
6 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
16
17
18
2H
4S
 
S
W
 
+100
-100
Ave
+150
+140
+450
14
6
8
87.5%
37.5%
50.0%
28 58.3% 157 54.51%
7 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
W
-450
+140
-50
+50
+170
+150
7
12
6
43.8%
75.0%
37.5%
25 52.1% 182 54.17%
8 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
1
2
3
1NT
1NT
4H
E
E
S
+90
+150
+50
+150
+430
+150
2
4
13
12.5%
25.0%
81.3%
19 39.6% 201 52.34%
9 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
7
8
9
4H
3S
2D
N
S
W
+200
-170
+130
+300
+530
+600
12
2
7
75.0%
12.5%
43.8%
21 43.8% 222 51.39%
Back to the results
Pair EW6 - Grace Hunter & Chris Hope. Total = 181.4 : 41.98% : 9th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
16
17
18
2H
4H
2S
S
S
N
-110
+50
+100
+150
+140
+450
3
13
2.4
18.8%
81.3%
14.8%
18.4 38.3% 18.4 38.28%
2 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
22
23
24
4H
2H
1NT
S
W
N
-450
+110
-90
+50
+170
+150
7
8
3
43.8%
50.0%
18.8%
18 37.5% 36.4 37.89%
3 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
1
2
3
1NT
1NT
4H
E
E
S
+90
+120
+150
+150
+430
+150
2
0
16
12.5%
0.0%
100.0%
18 37.5% 54.4 37.76%
4 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
7
8
9
4H
2S
3D
N
S
W
+200
-140
+110
+300
+530
+600
12
4
3
75.0%
25.0%
18.8%
19 39.6% 73.4 38.22%
5 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
13
14
15
5H
5D
4H
N
S
N
+100
-400
-680
+100
+650
+100
16
1
0
100.0%
6.3%
0.0%
17 35.4% 90.4 37.66%
6 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
19
20
21
3H
4S
3H
W
S
S
+170
-650
-140
+680
+200
+100
2
7
4
12.5%
43.8%
25.0%
13 27.1% 103.4 35.89%
7 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
25
26
27
3D
6NT
2S
W
W
W
-100
+1440
+140
-100
+1440
+800
16
15
6
100.0%
93.8%
37.5%
37 77.1% 140.4 41.78%
8 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
+110
+150
-200
+200
+490
+50
9
1
8
56.3%
6.3%
50.0%
18 37.5% 158.4 41.24%
9 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
10
11
12
3C
3S
3S
W
W
E
-100
-150
-50
+200
+130
+140
12
2
9
75.0%
12.5%
56.3%
23 47.9% 181.4 41.98%
Back to the results
Pair EW7 - Roger Chappel & Kevin Connolly. Total = 198.8 : 46.01% : 7th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
19
20
21
3H
4S
3H
W
S
S
+170
-650
-140
+680
+200
+100
2
7
4
12.5%
43.8%
25.0%
13 27.1% 13 27.08%
2 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
25
26
27
3S
4S
2S
S
E
W
-200
+680
+170
-100
+1440
+800
11
6
10
68.8%
37.5%
62.5%
27 56.3% 40 41.67%
3 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
4
5
6
2H
3D
2S
W
E
E
+110
+170
-300
+200
+490
+50
9
4
0
56.3%
25.0%
0.0%
13 27.1% 53 36.81%
4 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
10
11
12
2H
4D
Pass
S
E
 
-140
+130
Pass
+200
+130
+140
6
16
12
37.5%
100.0%
75.0%
34 70.8% 87 45.31%
5 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
16
17
18
1H
4H
2D
S
S
E
-110
-480
+110
+150
+140
+450
3
0
5.8
18.8%
0.0%
35.9%
8.8 18.2% 95.8 39.90%
6 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
22
23
24
4H
3H
1NT
S
W
S
-450
-100
-90
+50
+170
+150
7
3
3
43.8%
18.8%
18.8%
13 27.1% 108.8 37.76%
7 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
1
2
3
1NT
3NT
Pass
E
W
 
+150
+430
Pass
+150
+430
+150
16
14
10
100.0%
87.5%
62.5%
40 83.3% 148.8 44.27%
8 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
7
8
9
3S
3Hx
3C
S
E
N
-140
+530
+100
+300
+530
+600
6
16
0
37.5%
100.0%
0.0%
22 45.8% 170.8 44.47%
9 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
13
14
15
4H
4S
4H
N
S
S
-620
+100
-620
+100
+650
+100
6
11
11
37.5%
68.8%
68.8%
28 58.3% 198.8 46.01%
Back to the results
Pair EW8 - Jennifer Wilson & John Lambert. Total = 197.4 : 45.69% : 8th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
22
23
24
6H
3H
1NT
S
W
N
+50
+140
+50
+50
+170
+150
16
12
10
100.0%
75.0%
62.5%
38 79.2% 38 79.17%
2 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
1
2
3
1NT
2D
4H
E
W
S
+120
+130
-420
+150
+430
+150
10
2
5
62.5%
12.5%
31.3%
17 35.4% 55 57.29%
3 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
7
8
9
3H
4S
3D
N
S
W
-170
+50
+110
+300
+530
+600
4
10
3
25.0%
62.5%
18.8%
17 35.4% 72 50.00%
4 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
13
14
15
5Cx
4S
4H
W
S
S
-800
+100
-650
+100
+650
+100
0
11
5
0.0%
68.8%
31.3%
16 33.3% 88 45.83%
5 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
19
20
21
3H
6S
2H
W
S
S
+170
+200
-140
+680
+200
+100
2
16
4
12.5%
100.0%
25.0%
22 45.8% 110 45.83%
6 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
25
26
27
4Cx
4S
1NT
E
E
W
-500
+680
+120
-100
+1440
+800
0
6
4
0.0%
37.5%
25.0%
10 20.8% 120 41.67%
7 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
4
5
6
3S
5D
2S
S
E
E
+200
+420
-200
+200
+490
+50
16
7
8
100.0%
43.8%
50.0%
31 64.6% 151 44.94%
8 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
10
11
12
2H
3H
4H
S
S
N
-110
-140
-620
+200
+130
+140
9
5
0
56.3%
31.3%
0.0%
14 29.2% 165 42.97%
9 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
16
17
18
1S
3H
2H
E
N
E
-100
+50
+140
+150
+140
+450
8
13
11.4
50.0%
81.3%
71.1%
32.4 67.4% 197.4 45.69%
Back to the results
Pair EW9 - Josephine Finney & Eileen Cotton. Total = 213.1 : 49.33% : 4th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Margaret Johnson &
Christine Bainbridge
25
26
27
5C
4S
1NT
E
E
W
-200
+680
+180
-100
+1440
+800
11
6
13
68.8%
37.5%
81.3%
30 62.5% 30 62.50%
2 Nigel Durie &
David Turner
4
5
6
3Hx
3NT
2S
W
E
E
-800
+490
-200
+200
+490
+50
0
16
8
0.0%
100.0%
50.0%
24 50.0% 54 56.25%
3 Pauline Durie &
Audrey Bainbridge
10
11
12
2H
4H
2H
S
S
N
-110
+50
-140
+200
+130
+140
9
13
6
56.3%
81.3%
37.5%
28 58.3% 82 56.94%
4 Keith McCarthy &
Alison McCarthy
16
17
18
4H
4H
3NT
S
S
E
+150
-420
-150
+150
+140
+450
16
2
0.1
100.0%
12.5%
0.8%
18.1 37.8% 100.1 52.15%
5 Jean Hattersley
& Michael Hatton
22
23
24
4H
4H
1NT
S
W
S
-450
-200
+50
+50
+170
+150
7
0
10
43.8%
0.0%
62.5%
17 35.4% 117.1 48.80%
6 Bob Watts
& Liz Reese
1
2
3
1NT
2NT
4H
E
E
S
+90
+180
+50
+150
+430
+150
2
6
13
12.5%
37.5%
81.3%
21 43.8% 138.1 47.96%
7 Julian Gibson &
Hayden Dando
7
8
9
4H
3S
2NT
N
S
E
+100
-200
+150
+300
+530
+600
8
0
13
50.0%
0.0%
81.3%
21 43.8% 159.1 47.36%
8 Chris Johnson
& John Millman
13
14
15
5C
4S
4H
W
S
N
-200
+100
-650
+100
+650
+100
11
11
5
68.8%
68.8%
31.3%
27 56.3% 186.1 48.47%
9 Ted Murdoch
& Eddie Nord
19
20
21
3S
5S
4H
N
S
S
+200
-650
+100
+680
+200
+100
7
7
13
43.8%
43.8%
81.3%
27 56.3% 213.1 49.33%