St Georges Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Summer Pairs Round 2 - March 28, 2017

10 tables - Mitchell Share and Relay

Back to the results
Pair NS1 - Bev Godfrey & Nichola Cockerill-Smith. Total = 270.1 : 55.58% : 2nd/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
1
2
3
3NT
2D
4C
N
N
S
-50
+90
-50
+170
+120
-50
10.1
9
16.8
56.2%
50.0%
93.2%
35.9 66.5% 35.9 66.46%
2 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
+620
-110
+420
+650
+580
+430
12.3
3.4
13.4
68.5%
19.1%
74.7%
29.2 54.1% 65.1 60.29%
3 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
7
8
9
4S
2NT
3C
W
N
E
-620
+180
-130
+200
+180
+300
3.4
17.9
4.6
19.1%
99.4%
25.3%
25.9 47.9% 91 56.17%
4 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
10
11
12
3NT
2NT
2S
E
W
W
-600
-120
-200
+300
+100
+150
7.9
6.8
9
43.8%
37.7%
50.0%
23.7 43.8% 114.7 53.09%
5 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
13
14
15
7NTx
2S
3C
E
E
E
+200
-140
+50
+200
+100
+300
18
6
7.9
100.0%
33.3%
43.8%
31.9 59.1% 146.6 54.28%
6 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
16
17
18
3Sx
5D
2H
E
W
W
+500
+50
-110
+500
+400
+150
17.9
10.1
1.2
99.4%
56.2%
6.8%
29.2 54.1% 175.8 54.25%
7 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
19
20
21
3NT
4Hx
2S
S
E
S
+430
+800
+170
+430
+800
+620
17.9
17.9
14.6
99.4%
99.4%
80.9%
50.3 93.2% 226.1 59.82%
8 David Mills &
Peter Williams
22
23
24
5H
4H
4Hx
S
N
E
-50
+680
-590
+100
+680
+300
9
17.9
0.1
50.0%
99.4%
0.6%
27 50.0% 253.1 58.59%
9 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
25
26
27
4H
3H
4S
N
S
N
-100
-100
-50
+140
+300
+490
0.1
11.2
5.7
0.6%
62.3%
31.5%
17 31.5% 270.1 55.58%
Back to the results
Pair NS2 - Clive Owen & Christopher Owen. Total = 263.8 : 54.28% : 4th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
+620
-110
+420
+650
+580
+430
12.3
3.4
13.4
68.5%
19.1%
74.7%
29.2 54.1% 29.2 54.12%
2 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
7
8
9
4D
1NT
2H
N
S
S
-100
+90
-50
+200
+180
+300
11.2
4.6
11.2
62.3%
25.3%
62.3%
27 50.0% 56.2 52.06%
3 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
10
11
12
5NT
3D
3S
E
N
W
+300
-200
-170
+300
+100
+150
17.9
4.6
13.4
99.4%
25.3%
74.7%
35.9 66.5% 92.1 56.86%
4 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
13
14
15
3NT
2S
4H
E
E
N
-720
-140
-100
+200
+100
+300
5
6
4.6
27.8%
33.3%
25.3%
15.6 28.8% 107.7 49.85%
5 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
16
17
18
2NT
5Dx
2H
N
W
W
+180
+100
+100
+500
+400
+150
15.7
13.4
9
87.0%
74.7%
50.0%
38.1 70.6% 145.8 53.99%
6 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
19
20
21
2D
6D
3S
N
S
S
+130
-100
+140
+430
+800
+620
0.1
3.4
10.1
0.6%
19.1%
56.2%
13.7 25.3% 159.4 49.21%
7 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
22
23
24
5H
3Cx
4Sx
S
E
N
-50
+200
-100
+100
+680
+300
9
4.6
3.4
50.0%
25.3%
19.1%
17 31.5% 176.4 46.68%
8 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
25
26
27
2H
3H
3NT
N
S
S
+140
+140
+490
+140
+300
+490
16.8
15.7
17.9
93.2%
87.0%
99.4%
50.3 93.2% 226.8 52.49%
9 David Mills &
Peter Williams
28
29
30
3C
2H
4H
N
S
N
+150
+110
+480
+1370
+110
+480
2.8
16.5
17.8
15.3%
91.7%
98.6%
37 68.5% 263.8 54.28%
Back to the results
Pair NS3 - Eric Knight & Pauline Knight. Total = 283.3 : 58.29% : 1st/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
7
8
9
4S
1NT
2S
E
S
W
+100
+150
-140
+200
+180
+300
14.6
14.6
0.1
80.9%
80.9%
0.6%
29.2 54.1% 29.2 54.12%
2 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
10
11
12
3NT
2D
4S
E
E
W
+100
-110
-420
+300
+100
+150
12.3
9
6.8
68.5%
50.0%
37.7%
28.1 52.1% 57.3 53.09%
3 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
13
14
15
3NT
3S
5Cx
E
E
E
-720
+100
+300
+200
+100
+300
5
18
17.9
27.8%
100.0%
99.4%
40.9 75.7% 98.2 60.63%
4 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
16
17
18
1NT
4D
3H
S
W
W
+90
-130
+150
+500
+400
+150
0.1
4.6
15.7
0.6%
25.3%
87.0%
20.3 37.7% 118.6 54.89%
5 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
19
20
21
5C
4S
2S
N
S
S
+420
+650
+140
+430
+800
+620
13.4
15.7
10.1
74.7%
87.0%
56.2%
39.2 72.6% 157.8 58.44%
6 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
22
23
24
5H
4H
5Hx
S
N
W
-50
+650
+300
+100
+680
+300
9
12.3
16.8
50.0%
68.5%
93.2%
38.1 70.6% 195.9 60.46%
7 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
25
26
27
3H
4H
4S
N
N
N
-50
-200
-50
+140
+300
+490
5.7
1.2
5.7
31.5%
6.8%
31.5%
12.6 23.3% 208.4 55.14%
8 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
28
29
30
3NT
2C
2H
S
E
N
+600
-90
+200
+1370
+110
+480
11.5
7.8
5.3
63.9%
43.1%
29.2%
24.5 45.4% 232.9 53.92%
9 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
1
2
3
4C
2D
3NT
N
N
S
+170
+110
-50
+170
+120
-50
17.9
15.7
16.8
99.4%
87.0%
93.2%
50.3 93.2% 283.3 58.29%
Back to the results
Pair NS4 - Brian Hooper & Roger Chappel. Total = 213.6 : 43.96% : 8th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 David Mills &
Peter Williams
10
11
12
3NT
2Dx
4S
E
N
W
+100
-500
-450
+300
+100
+150
12.3
0.1
2.3
68.5%
0.6%
13.0%
14.8 27.4% 14.8 27.37%
2 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
13
14
15
3NT
2S
2S
E
E
S
-690
-140
+140
+200
+100
+300
10
6
13.4
55.6%
33.3%
74.7%
29.4 54.5% 44.2 40.95%
3 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
16
17
18
3D
5C
3S
N
S
S
+110
+400
-100
+500
+400
+150
5.7
17.9
5.7
31.5%
99.4%
31.5%
29.2 54.1% 73.4 45.34%
4 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
19
20
21
5C
4Hx
3C
N
E
N
+420
+500
-200
+430
+800
+620
13.4
11.2
0.1
74.7%
62.3%
0.6%
24.8 45.9% 98.2 45.47%
5 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
22
23
24
4Sx
4H
4S
W
S
N
-990
-100
-50
+100
+680
+300
0.1
1.2
7.9
0.6%
6.8%
43.8%
9.2 17.1% 107.4 39.79%
6 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
25
26
27
3H
2H
6S
N
S
N
-50
+110
-150
+140
+300
+490
5.7
13.4
0.1
31.5%
74.7%
0.6%
19.2 35.6% 126.7 39.09%
7 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
28
29
30
6C
5C
4H
N
E
N
+1370
+100
+450
+1370
+110
+480
17.8
11.5
11.5
98.6%
63.9%
63.9%
40.8 75.5% 167.4 44.29%
8 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
1
2
3
5C
2C
5C
N
W
S
-50
+100
-150
+170
+120
-50
10.1
12.3
0.1
56.2%
68.5%
0.6%
22.6 41.8% 190 43.98%
9 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
4
5
6
4H
3C
4H
N
S
S
+620
-100
-50
+650
+580
+430
12.3
10.1
1.2
68.5%
56.2%
6.8%
23.7 43.8% 213.6 43.96%
Back to the results
Pair NS5 - Terry Sweeney & Rita Sweeney. Total = 221.3 : 45.52% : 7th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
13
14
15
3NT
2S
5C
E
E
W
-690
+50
+100
+200
+100
+300
10
15
11.2
55.6%
83.3%
62.3%
36.2 67.1% 36.2 67.08%
2 David Mills &
Peter Williams
16
17
18
3D
4H
3S
N
E
S
+110
-420
-100
+500
+400
+150
5.7
0.1
5.7
31.5%
0.6%
31.5%
11.4 21.2% 47.7 44.14%
3 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
19
20
21
2C
5S
3D
N
S
N
+170
-300
-100
+430
+800
+620
6.8
0.1
4.6
37.7%
0.6%
25.3%
11.4 21.2% 59.1 36.49%
4 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
22
23
24
5C
4H
4S
S
N
N
-50
+650
-50
+100
+680
+300
9
12.3
7.9
50.0%
68.5%
43.8%
29.2 54.1% 88.3 40.90%
5 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
25
26
27
2H
3S
3NT
N
E
S
+140
-140
+430
+140
+300
+490
16.8
6.8
13.4
93.2%
37.7%
74.7%
37 68.5% 125.3 46.42%
6 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
28
29
30
5C
2C
4H
N
W
N
+600
-130
+450
+1370
+110
+480
11.5
5.3
11.5
63.9%
29.2%
63.9%
28.3 52.3% 153.6 47.40%
7 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
1
2
3
4D
2C
3S
E
W
E
+50
-90
-140
+170
+120
-50
13.4
4.6
7.9
74.7%
25.3%
43.8%
25.9 47.9% 179.5 47.48%
8 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
-100
+50
-50
+650
+580
+430
1.2
14.6
1.2
6.8%
80.9%
6.8%
17 31.5% 196.5 45.48%
9 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
7
8
9
4S
2H
4S
W
S
W
-620
+110
+100
+200
+180
+300
3.4
6.8
14.6
19.1%
37.7%
80.9%
24.8 45.9% 221.3 45.52%
Back to the results
Pair NS6 - Joan Stenson & Liz Robinson. Total = 270.1 : 55.57% : 3rd/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
19
20
21
2C
3Hx
4S
N
E
S
+170
+200
-100
+430
+800
+620
6.8
7.9
4.6
37.7%
43.8%
25.3%
19.2 35.6% 19.2 35.60%
2 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
22
23
24
4S
4H
2S
W
N
N
+100
+620
+140
+100
+680
+300
16.8
6.8
12.3
93.2%
37.7%
68.5%
35.9 66.5% 55.1 51.03%
3 David Mills &
Peter Williams
25
26
27
2H
3S
6NT
N
E
S
+110
-140
-50
+140
+300
+490
13.4
6.8
5.7
74.7%
37.7%
31.5%
25.9 47.9% 81 50.00%
4 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
28
29
30
5C
3NT
4H
N
W
S
+600
+100
+450
+1370
+110
+480
11.5
11.5
11.5
63.9%
63.9%
63.9%
34.5 63.9% 115.5 53.47%
5 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
1
2
3
5C
2H
3S
N
E
E
-100
+100
-140
+170
+120
-50
4.6
12.3
7.9
25.3%
68.5%
43.8%
24.8 45.9% 140.3 51.95%
6 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
4
5
6
4H
1NTx
3NT
N
S
S
+650
+580
+430
+650
+580
+430
17.9
17.9
17.9
99.4%
99.4%
99.4%
53.7 99.4% 193.9 59.86%
7 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
7
8
9
2S
1NT
2C
W
S
E
-140
+120
-130
+200
+180
+300
9
10.1
4.6
50.0%
56.2%
25.3%
23.7 43.8% 217.6 57.57%
8 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
3S
E
N
W
-630
-100
-170
+300
+100
+150
2.3
12.3
13.4
13.0%
68.5%
74.7%
28.1 52.1% 245.7 56.88%
9 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
13
14
15
3NT
2S
3C
E
E
E
-690
-110
-110
+200
+100
+300
10
12
2.3
55.6%
66.7%
13.0%
24.3 45.1% 270.1 55.57%
Back to the results
Pair NS7 - Roy Evans & Kevin Connolly. Total = 231.1 : 47.55% : 6th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
22
23
24
2S
4H
4Sx
W
N
N
-170
-100
-100
+100
+680
+300
2.3
1.2
3.4
13.0%
6.8%
19.1%
7 13.0% 7 12.96%
2 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
25
26
27
3H
4Hx
6D
N
S
N
-50
-200
-50
+140
+300
+490
5.7
1.2
5.7
31.5%
6.8%
31.5%
12.6 23.3% 19.6 18.11%
3 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
28
29
30
2C
2H
3H
N
S
S
+150
+110
+170
+1370
+110
+480
2.8
16.5
2.8
15.3%
91.7%
15.3%
22 40.7% 41.6 25.65%
4 David Mills &
Peter Williams
1
2
3
5C
1NT
3S
N
N
W
-100
-100
-140
+170
+120
-50
4.6
1.2
7.9
25.3%
6.8%
43.8%
13.7 25.3% 55.2 25.57%
5 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
4
5
6
4H
1H
2NT
N
W
S
-100
-110
+150
+650
+580
+430
1.2
3.4
9
6.8%
19.1%
50.0%
13.7 25.3% 68.9 25.51%
6 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
7
8
9
4Sx
3NT
3NT
W
S
E
+200
-50
+300
+200
+180
+300
17.9
1.2
17.9
99.4%
6.8%
99.4%
37 68.5% 105.9 32.68%
7 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
10
11
12
3NT
1NT
2S
E
N
E
+200
+90
-170
+300
+100
+150
15.7
15.7
13.4
87.0%
87.0%
74.7%
44.8 82.9% 150.7 39.86%
8 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
13
14
15
5D
3S
4C
W
E
W
-620
+50
+50
+200
+100
+300
15
15
7.9
83.3%
83.3%
43.8%
37.9 70.2% 188.6 43.65%
9 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
16
17
18
1NT
5Hx
3H
N
E
W
+120
+300
+150
+500
+400
+150
11.2
15.7
15.7
62.3%
87.0%
87.0%
42.6 78.8% 231.1 47.55%
Back to the results
Pair NS8 - Veronica Fuller & Linda Davison. Total = 211.4 : 43.50% : 9th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
25
26
27
3S
2S
3NT
E
E
S
+100
-140
+430
+140
+300
+490
11.2
6.8
13.4
62.3%
37.7%
74.7%
31.4 58.2% 31.4 58.23%
2 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
28
29
30
3C
1NTx
4H
N
N
S
+150
-200
+450
+1370
+110
+480
2.8
1.5
11.5
15.3%
8.3%
63.9%
15.8 29.2% 47.2 43.70%
3 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
1
2
3
3NT
2H
3S
N
E
E
-150
+50
-140
+170
+120
-50
0.1
6.8
7.9
0.6%
37.7%
43.8%
14.8 27.4% 62 38.25%
4 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
4
5
6
4H
2H
Pass
N
W
 
+620
+50
Pass
+650
+580
+430
12.3
14.6
4.6
68.5%
80.9%
25.3%
31.4 58.2% 93.4 43.25%
5 David Mills &
Peter Williams
7
8
9
2S
3C
2NT
W
W
W
-170
+150
-120
+200
+180
+300
6.8
14.6
9
37.7%
80.9%
50.0%
30.3 56.2% 123.8 45.83%
6 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
4S
W
N
W
-630
-100
-450
+300
+100
+150
2.3
12.3
2.3
13.0%
68.5%
13.0%
17 31.5% 140.8 43.44%
7 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
13
14
15
5D
3S
 
W
E
 
-620
-140
Ave
+200
+100
+300
15
6
9
83.3%
33.3%
50.0%
30 55.6% 170.8 45.17%
8 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
16
17
18
2D
4D
2S
N
W
W
+110
-130
+150
+500
+400
+150
5.7
4.6
15.7
31.5%
25.3%
87.0%
25.9 47.9% 196.6 45.52%
9 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
19
20
21
2C
4S
4S
N
S
S
+170
-100
-100
+430
+800
+620
6.8
3.4
4.6
37.7%
19.1%
25.3%
14.8 27.4% 211.4 43.50%
Back to the results
Pair NS9 - Stella Styles & Bernice Peakman. Total = 254.9 : 52.45% : 5th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
28
29
30
5C
1NTx
3H
N
N
S
+600
-200
+140
+1370
+110
+480
11.5
1.5
0.3
63.9%
8.3%
1.4%
13.3 24.5% 13.3 24.54%
2 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
1
2
3
4C
1NT
2S
N
N
W
+130
+120
-140
+170
+120
-50
15.7
17.9
7.9
87.0%
99.4%
43.8%
41.4 76.7% 54.7 50.64%
3 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
4
5
6
3H
2H
4H
N
W
S
+140
-110
+420
+650
+580
+430
4.6
3.4
13.4
25.3%
19.1%
74.7%
21.4 39.7% 76.1 47.00%
4 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
7
8
9
4S
1NT
3NT
E
S
E
+100
+120
+100
+200
+180
+300
14.6
10.1
14.6
80.9%
56.2%
80.9%
39.2 72.6% 115.4 53.41%
5 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
10
11
12
3NT
2H
4H
E
E
W
-600
+100
+150
+300
+100
+150
7.9
17.9
17.9
43.8%
99.4%
99.4%
43.7 80.9% 159 58.90%
6 David Mills &
Peter Williams
13
14
15
6D
2S
3C
E
E
W
-1370
-140
-130
+200
+100
+300
1
6
0.1
5.6%
33.3%
0.6%
7.1 13.2% 166.1 51.28%
7 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
16
17
18
2D
5D
2H
N
E
W
+110
+50
-110
+500
+400
+150
5.7
10.1
1.2
31.5%
56.2%
6.8%
17 31.5% 183.1 48.45%
8 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
19
20
21
4C
3NT
3S
S
N
N
+150
+600
+170
+430
+800
+620
2.3
13.4
14.6
13.0%
74.7%
80.9%
30.3 56.2% 213.5 49.41%
9 Pauline Hall &
Catherine Kemp
22
23
24
4S
4H
3S
W
S
N
+100
+650
+140
+100
+680
+300
16.8
12.3
12.3
93.2%
68.5%
68.5%
41.4 76.7% 254.9 52.45%
Back to the results
Pair NS10 - Ken Leybourne & Tom Fowke. Total = 210.4 : 43.30% : 10th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Michael Hall &
David Clarke
1
2
3
5C
3D
2S
N
S
E
-100
-100
-140
+170
+120
-50
4.6
1.2
7.9
25.3%
6.8%
43.8%
13.7 25.3% 13.7 25.31%
2 Ian Rudd &
John Machin
4
5
6
2H
3C
3H
N
S
S
+170
-100
+140
+650
+580
+430
6.8
10.1
6.8
37.7%
56.2%
37.7%
23.7 43.8% 37.3 34.57%
3 John Lambert
& Colin Gavin
7
8
9
4Sx
3NT
4C
W
S
E
-790
-50
-130
+200
+180
+300
0.1
1.2
4.6
0.6%
6.8%
25.3%
5.9 10.9% 43.2 26.68%
4 Alison McCarthy
& Keith McCarthy
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
4S
W
N
W
-630
-300
-450
+300
+100
+150
2.3
2.3
2.3
13.0%
13.0%
13.0%
7 13.0% 50.2 23.25%
5 Barbara Stott
& Fred Aitken
13
14
15
6D
2S
2S
W
E
S
-1370
-170
+170
+200
+100
+300
1
0
15.7
5.6%
0.0%
87.0%
16.7 30.9% 66.9 24.77%
6 Helen Pickersgill
& Dot Denham
16
17
18
3D
4D
2S
N
W
S
+130
-130
+110
+500
+400
+150
13.4
4.6
11.2
74.7%
25.3%
62.3%
29.2 54.1% 96.1 29.66%
7 David Mills &
Peter Williams
19
20
21
5C
3H
4S
N
E
S
+420
+200
+620
+430
+800
+620
13.4
7.9
17.9
74.7%
43.8%
99.4%
39.2 72.6% 135.3 35.80%
8 Rose Boddy &
Somaratna Weerasinghe
22
23
24
5H
4H
5Hx
S
N
W
-50
+650
+300
+100
+680
+300
9
12.3
16.8
50.0%
68.5%
93.2%
38.1 70.6% 173.4 40.15%
9 Christine Constable
& Maurice Denham
25
26
27
4H
4S
3NT
N
E
S
-50
+300
+430
+140
+300
+490
5.7
17.9
13.4
31.5%
99.4%
74.7%
37 68.5% 210.4 43.30%
Back to the results
Pair EW1 - Pauline Hall & Catherine Kemp. Total = 154.7 : 31.82% : 9th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
1
2
3
3NT
2D
4C
N
N
S
+50
-90
+50
+150
+100
+150
7.9
9
1.2
43.8%
50.0%
6.8%
18.1 33.5% 18.1 33.54%
2 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
7
8
9
4D
1NT
2H
N
S
S
+100
-90
+50
+790
+50
+140
6.8
13.4
6.8
37.7%
74.7%
37.7%
27 50.0% 45.1 41.77%
3 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
13
14
15
3NT
3S
5Cx
E
E
E
+720
-100
-300
+1370
+170
+130
13
0
0.1
72.2%
0.0%
0.6%
13.1 24.3% 58.2 35.94%
4 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
19
20
21
5C
4Hx
3C
N
E
N
-420
-500
+200
-130
+300
+200
4.6
6.8
17.9
25.3%
37.7%
99.4%
29.2 54.1% 87.4 40.48%
5 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
25
26
27
2H
3S
3NT
N
E
S
-140
+140
-430
+100
+200
+150
1.2
11.2
4.6
6.8%
62.3%
25.3%
17 31.5% 104.4 38.68%
6 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
4
5
6
4H
1NTx
3NT
N
S
S
-650
-580
-430
+100
+110
+50
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.3 0.6% 104.8 32.34%
7 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
10
11
12
3NT
1NT
2S
E
N
E
-200
-90
+170
+630
+500
+450
2.3
2.3
4.6
13.0%
13.0%
25.3%
9.2 17.1% 114 30.16%
8 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
16
17
18
2D
4D
2S
N
W
W
-110
+130
-150
-90
+420
+110
12.3
13.4
2.3
68.5%
74.7%
13.0%
28.1 52.1% 142.1 32.90%
9 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
22
23
24
4S
4H
3S
W
S
N
-100
-650
-140
+990
+100
+590
1.2
5.7
5.7
6.8%
31.5%
31.5%
12.6 23.3% 154.7 31.82%
Back to the results
Pair EW2 - Christine Constable & Maurice Denham. Total = 211.1 : 43.44% : 8th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
-620
+110
-420
+100
+110
+50
5.7
14.6
4.6
31.5%
80.9%
25.3%
24.8 45.9% 24.8 45.88%
2 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
10
11
12
3NT
2D
4S
E
E
W
-100
+110
+420
+630
+500
+450
5.7
9
11.2
31.5%
50.0%
62.3%
25.9 47.9% 50.7 46.91%
3 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
16
17
18
3D
5C
3S
N
S
S
-110
-400
+100
-90
+420
+110
12.3
0.1
12.3
68.5%
0.6%
68.5%
24.8 45.9% 75.4 46.57%
4 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
22
23
24
5C
4H
4S
S
N
N
+50
-650
+50
+990
+100
+590
9
5.7
10.1
50.0%
31.5%
56.2%
24.8 45.9% 100.2 46.40%
5 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
1
2
3
5C
2H
3S
N
E
E
+100
-100
+140
+150
+100
+150
13.4
5.7
10.1
74.7%
31.5%
56.2%
29.2 54.1% 129.4 47.94%
6 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
7
8
9
4Sx
3NT
3NT
W
S
E
-200
+50
-300
+790
+50
+140
0.1
16.8
0.1
0.6%
93.2%
0.6%
17 31.5% 146.4 45.20%
7 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
13
14
15
5D
3S
 
W
E
 
+620
+140
Ave
+1370
+170
+130
3
12
9
16.7%
66.7%
50.0%
24 44.4% 170.4 45.09%
8 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
19
20
21
4C
3NT
3S
S
N
N
-150
-600
-170
-130
+300
+200
15.7
4.6
3.4
87.0%
25.3%
19.1%
23.7 43.8% 194.1 44.93%
9 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
25
26
27
4H
4S
3NT
N
E
S
+50
-300
-430
+100
+200
+150
12.3
0.1
4.6
68.5%
0.6%
25.3%
17 31.5% 211.1 43.44%
Back to the results
Pair EW3 - Rose Boddy & Somaratna Weerasinghe. Total = 278.6 : 57.33% : 4th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
7
8
9
4S
1NT
2S
E
S
W
-100
-150
+140
+790
+50
+140
3.4
3.4
17.9
19.1%
19.1%
99.4%
24.8 45.9% 24.8 45.88%
2 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
13
14
15
3NT
2S
2S
E
E
S
+690
+140
-140
+1370
+170
+130
8
12
4.6
44.4%
66.7%
25.3%
24.6 45.5% 49.3 45.68%
3 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
19
20
21
2C
5S
3D
N
S
N
-170
+300
+100
-130
+300
+200
11.2
17.9
13.4
62.3%
99.4%
74.7%
42.6 78.8% 91.9 56.72%
4 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
28
29
30
5C
3NT
4H
N
W
S
-600
-100
-450
-150
+200
-140
6.5
6.5
6.5
36.1%
36.1%
36.1%
19.5 36.1% 111.4 51.57%
5 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
4
5
6
4H
1H
2NT
N
W
S
+100
+110
-150
+100
+110
+50
16.8
14.6
9
93.2%
80.9%
50.0%
40.3 74.7% 151.7 56.19%
6 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
4S
W
N
W
+630
+100
+450
+630
+500
+450
15.7
5.7
15.7
87.0%
31.5%
87.0%
37 68.5% 188.7 58.25%
7 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
16
17
18
2D
5D
2H
N
E
W
-110
-50
+110
-90
+420
+110
12.3
7.9
16.8
68.5%
43.8%
93.2%
37 68.5% 225.7 59.71%
8 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
22
23
24
5H
4H
5Hx
S
N
W
+50
-650
-300
+990
+100
+590
9
5.7
1.2
50.0%
31.5%
6.8%
15.9 29.4% 241.6 55.93%
9 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
25
26
27
4H
3H
4S
N
S
N
+100
+100
+50
+100
+200
+150
17.9
6.8
12.3
99.4%
37.7%
68.5%
37 68.5% 278.6 57.33%
Back to the results
Pair EW4 - David Mills & Peter Williams. Total = 279.6 : 57.52% : 3rd/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
10
11
12
3NT
2Dx
4S
E
N
W
-100
+500
+450
+630
+500
+450
5.7
17.9
15.7
31.5%
99.4%
87.0%
39.2 72.6% 39.2 72.63%
2 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
16
17
18
3D
4H
3S
N
E
S
-110
+420
+100
-90
+420
+110
12.3
17.9
12.3
68.5%
99.4%
68.5%
42.6 78.8% 81.8 75.72%
3 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
25
26
27
2H
3S
6NT
N
E
S
-110
+140
+50
+100
+200
+150
4.6
11.2
12.3
25.3%
62.3%
68.5%
28.1 52.1% 109.9 67.83%
4 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
1
2
3
5C
1NT
3S
N
N
W
+100
+100
+140
+150
+100
+150
13.4
16.8
10.1
74.7%
93.2%
56.2%
40.3 74.7% 150.2 69.55%
5 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
7
8
9
2S
3C
2NT
W
W
W
+170
-150
+120
+790
+50
+140
11.2
3.4
9
62.3%
19.1%
50.0%
23.7 43.8% 173.9 64.40%
6 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
13
14
15
6D
2S
3C
E
E
W
+1370
+140
+130
+1370
+170
+130
17
12
17.9
94.4%
66.7%
99.4%
46.9 86.8% 220.8 68.14%
7 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
19
20
21
5C
3H
4S
N
E
S
-420
-200
-620
-130
+300
+200
4.6
10.1
0.1
25.3%
56.2%
0.6%
14.8 27.4% 235.6 62.32%
8 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
22
23
24
5H
4H
4Hx
S
N
E
+50
-680
+590
+990
+100
+590
9
0.1
17.9
50.0%
0.6%
99.4%
27 50.0% 262.6 60.78%
9 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
28
29
30
3C
2H
4H
N
S
N
-150
-110
-480
-150
+200
-140
15.3
1.5
0.3
84.7%
8.3%
1.4%
17 31.5% 279.6 57.52%
Back to the results
Pair EW5 - Helen Pickersgill & Dot Denham. Total = 136.6 : 28.10% : 10th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
13
14
15
3NT
2S
5C
E
E
W
+690
-50
-100
+1370
+170
+130
8
3
6.8
44.4%
16.7%
37.7%
17.8 32.9% 17.8 32.92%
2 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
22
23
24
4S
4H
2S
W
N
N
-100
-620
-140
+990
+100
+590
1.2
11.2
5.7
6.8%
62.3%
31.5%
18.1 33.5% 35.9 33.23%
3 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
28
29
30
2C
2H
3H
N
S
S
-150
-110
-170
-150
+200
-140
15.3
1.5
15.3
84.7%
8.3%
84.7%
32 59.3% 67.9 41.91%
4 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
4
5
6
4H
2H
Pass
N
W
 
-620
-50
Pass
+100
+110
+50
5.7
3.4
13.4
31.5%
19.1%
74.7%
22.6 41.8% 90.4 41.87%
5 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
10
11
12
3NT
2H
4H
E
E
W
+600
-100
-150
+630
+500
+450
10.1
0.1
0.1
56.2%
0.6%
0.6%
10.3 19.1% 100.8 37.33%
6 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
16
17
18
3D
4D
2S
N
W
S
-130
+130
-110
-90
+420
+110
4.6
13.4
6.8
25.3%
74.7%
37.7%
24.8 45.9% 125.6 38.75%
7 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
19
20
21
3NT
4Hx
2S
S
E
S
-430
-800
-170
-130
+300
+200
0.1
0.1
3.4
0.6%
0.6%
19.1%
3.7 6.8% 129.2 34.19%
8 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
25
26
27
2H
3H
3NT
N
S
S
-140
-140
-490
+100
+200
+150
1.2
2.3
0.1
6.8%
13.0%
0.6%
3.7 6.8% 132.9 30.76%
9 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
1
2
3
4C
2D
3NT
N
N
S
-170
-110
+50
+150
+100
+150
0.1
2.3
1.2
0.6%
13.0%
6.8%
3.7 6.8% 136.6 28.10%
Back to the results
Pair EW6 - Barbara Stott & Fred Aitken. Total = 289.2 : 59.50% : 2nd/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
19
20
21
2C
3Hx
4S
N
E
S
-170
-200
+100
-130
+300
+200
11.2
10.1
13.4
62.3%
56.2%
74.7%
34.8 64.4% 34.8 64.40%
2 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
25
26
27
3H
4Hx
6D
N
S
N
+50
+200
+50
+100
+200
+150
12.3
16.8
12.3
68.5%
93.2%
68.5%
41.4 76.7% 76.2 70.58%
3 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
1
2
3
3NT
2H
3S
N
E
E
+150
-50
+140
+150
+100
+150
17.9
11.2
10.1
99.4%
62.3%
56.2%
39.2 72.6% 115.4 71.26%
4 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
7
8
9
4S
1NT
3NT
E
S
E
-100
-120
-100
+790
+50
+140
3.4
7.9
3.4
19.1%
43.8%
19.1%
14.8 27.4% 130.2 60.29%
5 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
13
14
15
6D
2S
2S
W
E
S
+1370
+170
-170
+1370
+170
+130
17
18
2.3
94.4%
100.0%
13.0%
37.3 69.1% 167.6 62.06%
6 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
16
17
18
3Sx
5D
2H
E
W
W
-500
-50
+110
-90
+420
+110
0.1
7.9
16.8
0.6%
43.8%
93.2%
24.8 45.9% 192.3 59.36%
7 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
22
23
24
5H
3Cx
4Sx
S
E
N
+50
-200
+100
+990
+100
+590
9
13.4
14.6
50.0%
74.7%
80.9%
37 68.5% 229.3 60.67%
8 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
28
29
30
3NT
2C
2H
S
E
N
-600
+90
-200
-150
+200
-140
6.5
10.3
12.8
36.1%
56.9%
70.8%
29.5 54.6% 258.8 59.92%
9 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
4
5
6
4H
3C
4H
N
S
S
-620
+100
+50
+100
+110
+50
5.7
7.9
16.8
31.5%
43.8%
93.2%
30.3 56.2% 289.2 59.50%
Back to the results
Pair EW7 - Alison McCarthy & Keith McCarthy. Total = 329.4 : 67.77% : 1st/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
22
23
24
2S
4H
4Sx
W
N
N
+170
+100
+100
+990
+100
+590
15.7
16.8
14.6
87.0%
93.2%
80.9%
47 87.0% 47 87.04%
2 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
28
29
30
3C
1NTx
4H
N
N
S
-150
+200
-450
-150
+200
-140
15.3
16.5
6.5
84.7%
91.7%
36.1%
38.3 70.8% 85.3 78.94%
3 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
4
5
6
3H
2H
4H
N
W
S
-140
+110
-420
+100
+110
+50
13.4
14.6
4.6
74.7%
80.9%
25.3%
32.6 60.3% 117.8 72.72%
4 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
4S
W
N
W
+630
+300
+450
+630
+500
+450
15.7
15.7
15.7
87.0%
87.0%
87.0%
47 87.0% 164.8 76.30%
5 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
13
14
15
7NTx
2S
3C
E
E
E
-200
+140
-50
+1370
+170
+130
0
12
10.1
0.0%
66.7%
56.2%
22.1 40.9% 186.9 69.23%
6 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
19
20
21
2D
6D
3S
N
S
S
-130
+100
-140
-130
+300
+200
17.9
14.6
7.9
99.4%
80.9%
43.8%
40.3 74.7% 227.2 70.14%
7 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
25
26
27
3H
4H
4S
N
N
N
+50
+200
+50
+100
+200
+150
12.3
16.8
12.3
68.5%
93.2%
68.5%
41.4 76.7% 268.7 71.08%
8 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
1
2
3
5C
2C
5C
N
W
S
+50
-100
+150
+150
+100
+150
7.9
5.7
17.9
43.8%
31.5%
99.4%
31.4 58.2% 300.1 69.48%
9 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
7
8
9
4S
2H
4S
W
S
W
+620
-110
-100
+790
+50
+140
14.6
11.2
3.4
80.9%
62.3%
19.1%
29.2 54.1% 329.4 67.77%
Back to the results
Pair EW8 - John Lambert & Colin Gavin. Total = 225.3 : 46.35% : 7th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
25
26
27
3S
2S
3NT
E
E
S
-100
+140
-430
+100
+200
+150
6.8
11.2
4.6
37.7%
62.3%
25.3%
22.6 41.8% 22.6 41.77%
2 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
1
2
3
4C
1NT
2S
N
N
W
-130
-120
+140
+150
+100
+150
2.3
0.1
10.1
13.0%
0.6%
56.2%
12.6 23.3% 35.1 32.51%
3 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
7
8
9
4Sx
3NT
4C
W
S
E
+790
+50
+130
+790
+50
+140
17.9
16.8
13.4
99.4%
93.2%
74.7%
48.1 89.1% 83.2 51.37%
4 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
10
11
12
3NT
2NT
2S
E
W
W
+600
+120
+200
+630
+500
+450
10.1
11.2
9
56.2%
62.3%
50.0%
30.3 56.2% 113.6 52.57%
5 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
16
17
18
2NT
5Dx
2H
N
W
W
-180
-100
-100
-90
+420
+110
2.3
4.6
9
13.0%
25.3%
50.0%
15.9 29.4% 129.4 47.94%
6 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
22
23
24
5H
4H
5Hx
S
N
W
+50
-650
-300
+990
+100
+590
9
5.7
1.2
50.0%
31.5%
6.8%
15.9 29.4% 145.3 44.86%
7 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
28
29
30
6C
5C
4H
N
E
N
-1370
-100
-450
-150
+200
-140
0.3
6.5
6.5
1.4%
36.1%
36.1%
13.3 24.5% 158.6 41.95%
8 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
+100
-50
+50
+100
+110
+50
16.8
3.4
16.8
93.2%
19.1%
93.2%
37 68.5% 195.6 45.27%
9 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
13
14
15
3NT
2S
3C
E
E
E
+690
+110
+110
+1370
+170
+130
8
6
15.7
44.4%
33.3%
87.0%
29.7 54.9% 225.2 46.35%
Back to the results
Pair EW9 - Ian Rudd & John Machin. Total = 252.6 : 51.98% : 6th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Stella Styles &
Bernice Peakman
28
29
30
5C
1NTx
3H
N
N
S
-600
+200
-140
-150
+200
-140
6.5
16.5
17.8
36.1%
91.7%
98.6%
40.8 75.5% 40.8 75.46%
2 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
4
5
6
2H
3C
3H
N
S
S
-170
+100
-140
+100
+110
+50
11.2
7.9
11.2
62.3%
43.8%
62.3%
30.3 56.2% 71.1 65.82%
3 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
7
8
9
4S
2NT
3C
W
N
E
+620
-180
+130
+790
+50
+140
14.6
0.1
13.4
80.9%
0.6%
74.7%
28.1 52.1% 99.2 61.23%
4 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
13
14
15
3NT
2S
4H
E
E
N
+720
+140
+100
+1370
+170
+130
13
12
13.4
72.2%
66.7%
74.7%
38.4 71.2% 137.6 63.72%
5 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
19
20
21
5C
4S
2S
N
S
S
-420
-650
-140
-130
+300
+200
4.6
2.3
7.9
25.3%
13.0%
43.8%
14.8 27.4% 152.4 56.45%
6 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
25
26
27
3H
2H
6S
N
S
N
+50
-110
+150
+100
+200
+150
12.3
4.6
17.9
68.5%
25.3%
99.4%
34.8 64.4% 187.2 57.78%
7 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
1
2
3
4D
2C
3S
E
W
E
-50
+90
+140
+150
+100
+150
4.6
13.4
10.1
25.3%
74.7%
56.2%
28.1 52.1% 215.3 56.96%
8 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
10
11
12
3NT
1NTx
3S
E
N
W
+630
+100
+170
+630
+500
+450
15.7
5.7
4.6
87.0%
31.5%
25.3%
25.9 47.9% 241.2 55.83%
9 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
16
17
18
1NT
5Hx
3H
N
E
W
-120
-300
-150
-90
+420
+110
6.8
2.3
2.3
37.7%
13.0%
13.0%
11.4 21.2% 252.6 51.98%
Back to the results
Pair EW10 - Michael Hall & David Clarke. Total = 273.1 : 56.19% : 5th/10 : Top is 18.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ken Leybourne
& Tom Fowke
1
2
3
5C
3D
2S
N
S
E
+100
+100
+140
+150
+100
+150
13.4
16.8
10.1
74.7%
93.2%
56.2%
40.3 74.7% 40.3 74.69%
2 Bev Godfrey &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
4
5
6
4H
2H
4H
N
W
S
-620
+110
-420
+100
+110
+50
5.7
14.6
4.6
31.5%
80.9%
25.3%
24.8 45.9% 65.1 60.29%
3 Clive Owen &
Christopher Owen
10
11
12
5NT
3D
3S
E
N
W
-300
+200
+170
+630
+500
+450
0.1
13.4
4.6
0.6%
74.7%
25.3%
18.1 33.5% 83.2 51.37%
4 Eric Knight &
Pauline Knight
16
17
18
1NT
4D
3H
S
W
W
-90
+130
-150
-90
+420
+110
17.9
13.4
2.3
99.4%
74.7%
13.0%
33.7 62.3% 116.9 54.12%
5 Brian Hooper &
Roger Chappel
22
23
24
4Sx
4H
4S
W
S
N
+990
+100
+50
+990
+100
+590
17.9
16.8
10.1
99.4%
93.2%
56.2%
44.8 82.9% 161.7 59.88%
6 Terry Sweeney
& Rita Sweeney
28
29
30
5C
2C
4H
N
W
N
-600
+130
-450
-150
+200
-140
6.5
12.8
6.5
36.1%
70.8%
36.1%
25.8 47.7% 187.4 57.84%
7 Joan Stenson
& Liz Robinson
7
8
9
2S
1NT
2C
W
S
E
+140
-120
+130
+790
+50
+140
9
7.9
13.4
50.0%
43.8%
74.7%
30.3 56.2% 217.8 57.61%
8 Roy Evans &
Kevin Connolly
13
14
15
5D
3S
4C
W
E
W
+620
-50
-50
+1370
+170
+130
3
3
10.1
16.7%
16.7%
56.2%
16.1 29.8% 233.9 54.13%
9 Veronica Fuller
& Linda Davison
19
20
21
2C
4S
4S
N
S
S
-170
+100
+100
-130
+300
+200
11.2
14.6
13.4
62.3%
80.9%
74.7%
39.2 72.6% 273.1 56.19%