Darlington Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Tony Urwin Trophy Round 4 - June 8, 2017

9 tables - Mitchell

Back to the results
Pair NS1 - Peter Burnip & Margaret Smith. Total = 185.6 : 42.97% : 7th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
1
2
3
4NT
2S
4Sx
N
W
N
+460
+100
-300
+480
+150
+200
12
5
1
75.0%
31.3%
6.3%
18 37.5% 18 37.50%
2 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
4
5
6
3D
3NT
4S
W
W
E
-110
-460
-650
+200
-170
+100
0
4
8
0.0%
25.0%
50.0%
12 25.0% 30 31.25%
3 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
7
8
9
3S
1NT
2S
W
W
W
+500
-90
-110
+1100
-90
+200
14
16
8
87.5%
100.0%
50.0%
38 79.2% 68 47.22%
4 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
10
11
12
2H
3H
1NT
N
S
N
-200
-100
+120
+600
+150
+150
2
0
10
12.5%
0.0%
62.5%
12 25.0% 80 41.67%
5 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
13
14
15
3D
4NT
1S
N
E
W
+110
+500
-80
+300
+980
+50
11
12
10
68.8%
75.0%
62.5%
33 68.8% 113 47.08%
6 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
16
17
18
4H
2H
3C
W
E
N
+200
-140
-100
+300
+50
+90
11
8
6
68.8%
50.0%
37.5%
25 52.1% 138 47.92%
7 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
19
20
21
1NT
5Dx
6NT
N
N
S
-50
-200
+1440
+100
+300
+1440
5
2
16
31.3%
12.5%
100.0%
23 47.9% 161 47.92%
8 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
22
23
24
4S
3C
2H
W
W
N
-680
-110
+110
-650
+1100
+140
9
0
4.6
56.3%
0.0%
28.9%
13.6 28.4% 174.6 45.48%
9 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
25
26
27
4S
2S
4D
W
N
W
-620
+140
+100
+100
+660
+140
3
2
6
18.8%
12.5%
37.5%
11 22.9% 185.6 42.97%
Back to the results
Pair NS2 - Marian Wilson & Gypsy Nichol. Total = 257.0 : 59.49% : 1st/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
4
5
6
1NT
5D
4S
W
E
E
-90
-400
-650
+200
-170
+100
2
14
8
12.5%
87.5%
50.0%
24 50.0% 24 50.00%
2 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
7
8
9
4C
1NT
4S
N
W
W
+130
-150
+200
+1100
-90
+200
7
3
14
43.8%
18.8%
87.5%
24 50.0% 48 50.00%
3 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
10
11
12
3NT
2S
3Hx
N
E
S
-200
+50
-200
+600
+150
+150
2
6
2
12.5%
37.5%
12.5%
10 20.8% 58 40.28%
4 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
13
14
15
2H
4S
5C
S
N
E
-100
+510
+50
+300
+980
+50
6
14
14
37.5%
87.5%
87.5%
34 70.8% 92 47.92%
5 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
16
17
18
4H
3H
1NT
W
W
S
+200
-140
+90
+300
+50
+90
11
8
14
68.8%
50.0%
87.5%
33 68.8% 125 52.08%
6 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
19
20
21
3C
5D
6NT
E
N
N
+100
-100
-100
+100
+300
+1440
14
7
11
87.5%
43.8%
68.8%
32 66.7% 157 54.51%
7 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
22
23
24
4S
5Cx
 
W
E
 
-680
+800
Ave
-650
+1100
+140
9
14
8
56.3%
87.5%
50.0%
31 64.6% 188 55.95%
8 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
25
26
27
4S
3NT
2H
E
S
N
+100
+630
+140
+100
+660
+140
16
12
14
100.0%
75.0%
87.5%
42 87.5% 230 59.90%
9 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
1
2
3
3NT
1NT
4S
N
N
N
+460
+120
-100
+480
+150
+200
12
10
5
75.0%
62.5%
31.3%
27 56.3% 257 59.49%
Back to the results
Pair NS3 - Ted Murdoch & Peter Williams. Total = 230.6 : 53.39% : 4th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
7
8
9
3S
2NT
2S
W
W
W
+400
-120
-140
+1100
-90
+200
12
11
4
75.0%
68.8%
25.0%
27 56.3% 27 56.25%
2 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
10
11
12
3D
2H
2H
S
S
S
-100
+110
+140
+600
+150
+150
8
11
13
50.0%
68.8%
81.3%
32 66.7% 59 61.46%
3 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
13
14
15
3Hx
6D
4C
S
E
W
-200
+150
-130
+300
+980
+50
1
6
6
6.3%
37.5%
37.5%
13 27.1% 72 50.00%
4 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
16
17
18
4D
4H
2S
N
W
E
+130
+50
-110
+300
+50
+90
5
15
0
31.3%
93.8%
0.0%
20 41.7% 92 47.92%
5 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
19
20
21
3C
4H
6NT
E
E
N
+100
+300
-100
+100
+300
+1440
14
16
11
87.5%
100.0%
68.8%
41 85.4% 133 55.42%
6 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
22
23
24
5S
4S
2H
W
S
N
-680
-100
+110
-650
+1100
+140
9
3
4.6
56.3%
18.8%
28.9%
16.6 34.6% 149.6 51.95%
7 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
25
26
27
2NT
3NT
2H
W
N
N
-120
+630
+140
+100
+660
+140
14
12
14
87.5%
75.0%
87.5%
40 83.3% 189.6 56.44%
8 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
1
2
3
4H
1NT
3S
N
N
N
+480
+90
+140
+480
+150
+200
16
2
12
100.0%
12.5%
75.0%
30 62.5% 219.6 57.19%
9 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
4Sx
W
W
E
+100
-460
-990
+200
-170
+100
7
4
0
43.8%
25.0%
0.0%
11 22.9% 230.6 53.39%
Back to the results
Pair NS4 - Audrey Spencer & Anne Welsh. Total = 205.6 : 47.60% : 5th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
10
11
12
3NT
3H
3H
N
S
S
+600
-50
-100
+600
+150
+150
16
3
5
100.0%
18.8%
31.3%
24 50.0% 24 50.00%
2 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
13
14
15
2S
4S
4Hx
E
N
N
+300
-50
-800
+300
+980
+50
16
1
0
100.0%
6.3%
0.0%
17 35.4% 41 42.71%
3 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
16
17
18
4H
2H
1NT
W
E
S
+200
-200
-100
+300
+50
+90
11
0
6
68.8%
0.0%
37.5%
17 35.4% 58 40.28%
4 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
19
20
21
3C
5Dx
6NT
E
N
N
+100
-200
-200
+100
+300
+1440
14
2
4
87.5%
12.5%
25.0%
20 41.7% 78 40.63%
5 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
22
23
24
4S
3S
2H
W
S
N
-680
-100
+110
-650
+1100
+140
9
3
4.6
56.3%
18.8%
28.9%
16.6 34.6% 94.6 39.43%
6 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
25
26
27
3S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
-140
+630
-50
+100
+660
+140
11
12
3
68.8%
75.0%
18.8%
26 54.2% 120.6 41.88%
7 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
1
2
3
6NT
1NT
3S
N
N
S
-50
+150
+140
+480
+150
+200
3
15
12
18.8%
93.8%
75.0%
30 62.5% 150.6 44.83%
8 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
4
5
6
1NT
3Sx
4S
E
W
E
+200
-530
-650
+200
-170
+100
14
0
8
87.5%
0.0%
50.0%
22 45.8% 172.6 44.95%
9 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
7
8
9
3Dx
2NT
4S
E
W
W
+1100
-150
+200
+1100
-90
+200
16
3
14
100.0%
18.8%
87.5%
33 68.8% 205.6 47.60%
Back to the results
Pair NS5 - Brian R Smith & John Greaves. Total = 176.6 : 40.89% : 9th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
13
14
15
3D
4S
3S
N
N
W
-100
+480
-140
+300
+980
+50
6
10
4
37.5%
62.5%
25.0%
20 41.7% 20 41.67%
2 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
16
17
18
3H
3H
1NT
W
W
S
+100
-170
-100
+300
+50
+90
2
2
6
12.5%
12.5%
37.5%
10 20.8% 30 31.25%
3 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
19
20
21
1NT
4D
7NT
N
N
N
-50
+130
-200
+100
+300
+1440
5
12
4
31.3%
75.0%
25.0%
21 43.8% 51 35.42%
4 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
22
23
24
4S
3C
2S
W
W
N
-650
+100
+140
-650
+1100
+140
16
6
13.6
100.0%
37.5%
85.2%
35.6 74.2% 86.6 45.12%
5 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
25
26
27
4S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
-620
+600
+140
+100
+660
+140
3
8
14
18.8%
50.0%
87.5%
25 52.1% 111.6 46.51%
6 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
1
2
3
6NT
3C
4Sx
N
S
N
-100
-100
-300
+480
+150
+200
0
0
1
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
1 2.1% 112.6 39.11%
7 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
4
5
6
2NT
3NT
4S
W
W
E
+200
-430
-650
+200
-170
+100
14
10
8
87.5%
62.5%
50.0%
32 66.7% 144.6 43.04%
8 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
7
8
9
3C
2NT
4S
N
W
W
+170
-150
+200
+1100
-90
+200
10
3
14
62.5%
18.8%
87.5%
27 56.3% 171.6 44.69%
9 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
10
11
12
3NT
2H
4Hx
N
S
N
-200
-50
-500
+600
+150
+150
2
3
0
12.5%
18.8%
0.0%
5 10.4% 176.6 40.89%
Back to the results
Pair NS6 - Nigel Durie & Pauline Durie. Total = 199.6 : 46.21% : 6th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
16
17
18
5D
3H
1NT
N
W
S
-50
-140
+90
+300
+50
+90
0
8
14
0.0%
50.0%
87.5%
22 45.8% 22 45.83%
2 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
19
20
21
2NT
5D
6NT
N
N
N
-50
-100
-100
+100
+300
+1440
5
7
11
31.3%
43.8%
68.8%
23 47.9% 45 46.88%
3 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
22
23
24
4S
2S
2H
W
S
S
-680
+140
+110
-650
+1100
+140
9
8
4.6
56.3%
50.0%
28.9%
21.6 45.1% 66.6 46.27%
4 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
25
26
27
4S
2D
2H
W
S
N
-620
+150
-50
+100
+660
+140
3
4
3
18.8%
25.0%
18.8%
10 20.8% 76.6 39.91%
5 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
1
2
3
4H
1NT
4S
N
N
N
+450
+120
-100
+480
+150
+200
7
10
5
43.8%
62.5%
31.3%
22 45.8% 98.6 41.09%
6 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
6S
W
W
W
+100
-460
+100
+200
-170
+100
7
4
16
43.8%
25.0%
100.0%
27 56.3% 125.6 43.62%
7 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
7
8
9
4C
1NT
2S
N
W
W
+130
-120
-170
+1100
-90
+200
7
11
0
43.8%
68.8%
0.0%
18 37.5% 143.6 42.75%
8 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
10
11
12
3C
3S
1NT
S
E
S
+110
+100
+90
+600
+150
+150
12
8
8
75.0%
50.0%
50.0%
28 58.3% 171.6 44.69%
9 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
13
14
15
2H
4S
4S
S
N
W
-100
+420
+50
+300
+980
+50
6
8
14
37.5%
50.0%
87.5%
28 58.3% 199.6 46.21%
Back to the results
Pair NS7 - Andrew Simmons & Christine Simmons. Total = 254.6 : 58.94% : 2nd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
19
20
21
1NT
4D
6NT
N
N
N
-50
+130
-100
+100
+300
+1440
5
12
11
31.3%
75.0%
68.8%
28 58.3% 28 58.33%
2 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
22
23
24
4S
3H
2H
W
E
S
-680
+200
+140
-650
+1100
+140
9
10
13.6
56.3%
62.5%
85.2%
32.6 68.0% 60.6 63.15%
3 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
25
26
27
2S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
-140
+660
+110
+100
+660
+140
11
16
9
68.8%
100.0%
56.3%
36 75.0% 96.6 67.10%
4 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
1
2
3
4H
1NT
2S
N
N
S
+450
+120
+140
+480
+150
+200
7
10
12
43.8%
62.5%
75.0%
29 60.4% 125.6 65.43%
5 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
4S
W
W
E
+200
-430
-650
+200
-170
+100
14
10
8
87.5%
62.5%
50.0%
32 66.7% 157.6 65.68%
6 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
7
8
9
2S
2NT
2S
N
W
W
+110
-120
-140
+1100
-90
+200
4
11
4
25.0%
68.8%
25.0%
19 39.6% 176.6 61.33%
7 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
10
11
12
3NT
2S
1NT
S
W
N
-100
+150
+150
+600
+150
+150
8
16
16
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 83.3% 216.6 64.47%
8 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
13
14
15
3H
5D
1S
S
W
W
-200
+100
-110
+300
+980
+50
1
4
8
6.3%
25.0%
50.0%
13 27.1% 229.6 59.80%
9 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
16
17
18
4H
3H
3C
W
W
N
+200
-140
-100
+300
+50
+90
11
8
6
68.8%
50.0%
37.5%
25 52.1% 254.6 58.94%
Back to the results
Pair NS8 - Harald Volkmann & Ros Wigham. Total = 251.6 : 58.25% : 3rd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
22
23
24
6D
5Cx
2H
E
W
S
-1370
+500
+140
-650
+1100
+140
2
12
13.6
12.5%
75.0%
85.2%
27.6 57.6% 27.6 57.55%
2 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
25
26
27
3NT
1NT
2S
W
N
S
-600
+210
+110
+100
+660
+140
8
6
9
50.0%
37.5%
56.3%
23 47.9% 50.6 52.73%
3 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
1
2
3
6NT
1NT
2S
N
N
N
-50
+150
+110
+480
+150
+200
3
15
8
18.8%
93.8%
50.0%
26 54.2% 76.6 53.21%
4 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
5S
W
W
E
+100
-430
-650
+200
-170
+100
7
10
8
43.8%
62.5%
50.0%
25 52.1% 101.6 52.93%
5 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
7
8
9
3S
1NT
3S
N
W
W
-200
-120
+100
+1100
-90
+200
0
11
10
0.0%
68.8%
62.5%
21 43.8% 122.6 51.09%
6 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
10
11
12
3C
2H
3H
S
S
N
+130
+140
+140
+600
+150
+150
14
14
13
87.5%
87.5%
81.3%
41 85.4% 163.6 56.81%
7 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
13
14
15
3D
6S
4S
N
N
W
+110
+980
+50
+300
+980
+50
11
16
14
68.8%
100.0%
87.5%
41 85.4% 204.6 60.90%
8 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
16
17
18
4D
4H
3C
N
W
N
+130
+50
-100
+300
+50
+90
5
15
6
31.3%
93.8%
37.5%
26 54.2% 230.6 60.06%
9 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
19
20
21
2NT
4D
6NT
N
N
N
-50
+130
-200
+100
+300
+1440
5
12
4
31.3%
75.0%
25.0%
21 43.8% 251.6 58.25%
Back to the results
Pair NS9 - Margaret Johnson & Eileen Cotton. Total = 182.6 : 42.27% : 8th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bohdan Hnyda
& John Eglington
25
26
27
4H
3NT
3S
W
S
S
-620
-100
-150
+100
+660
+140
3
0
0
18.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3 6.3% 3 6.25%
2 Beverley Marriner
& David Mills
1
2
3
3NT
3S
4Hx
N
E
W
+460
+100
+200
+480
+150
+200
12
5
16
75.0%
31.3%
100.0%
33 68.8% 36 37.50%
3 Patricia Ellis &
Chris Johnson
4
5
6
1NT
3D
4S
W
E
E
+100
-170
-650
+200
-170
+100
7
16
8
43.8%
100.0%
50.0%
31 64.6% 67 46.53%
4 Roger Hancock
& Jill Hancock
7
8
9
4H
2NT
2S
S
E
W
-100
-150
-140
+1100
-90
+200
2
3
4
12.5%
18.8%
25.0%
9 18.8% 76 39.58%
5 Pat Braithwaite
& Pat De Martino
10
11
12
2H
2H
2H
N
S
N
-100
+110
-100
+600
+150
+150
8
11
5
50.0%
68.8%
31.3%
24 50.0% 100 41.67%
6 Ruth Studholme
& Guy Studholme
13
14
15
2S
4S
3Hx
E
N
N
+200
-50
-500
+300
+980
+50
14
1
2
87.5%
6.3%
12.5%
17 35.4% 117 40.63%
7 Barbara Stott &
Roger Chappel
16
17
18
3NT
3H
1NT
E
W
S
+300
-140
+90
+300
+50
+90
16
8
14
100.0%
50.0%
87.5%
38 79.2% 155 46.13%
8 Adrian Darnell
& Joe Bateman
19
20
21
1NT
5D
6NT
N
S
N
-50
-200
-400
+100
+300
+1440
5
2
0
31.3%
12.5%
0.0%
7 14.6% 162 42.19%
9 John Boughey
& Eddie Nord
22
23
24
6S
5Dx
2H
W
E
S
-1430
+1100
+110
-650
+1100
+140
0
16
4.6
0.0%
100.0%
28.9%
20.6 43.0% 182.6 42.27%
Back to the results
Pair EW1 - John Boughey & Eddie Nord. Total = 218.4 : 50.55% : 4th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
1
2
3
4NT
2S
4Sx
N
W
N
-460
-100
+300
+100
+100
+300
4
11
15
25.0%
68.8%
93.8%
30 62.5% 30 62.50%
2 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
7
8
9
4C
1NT
4S
N
W
W
-130
+150
-200
+200
+150
+170
9
13
2
56.3%
81.3%
12.5%
24 50.0% 54 56.25%
3 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
13
14
15
3Hx
6D
4C
S
E
W
+200
-150
+130
+200
+50
+800
15
10
10
93.8%
62.5%
62.5%
35 72.9% 89 61.81%
4 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
19
20
21
3C
5Dx
6NT
E
N
N
-100
+200
+200
+50
+200
+400
2
14
12
12.5%
87.5%
75.0%
28 58.3% 117 60.94%
5 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
25
26
27
4S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
+620
-600
-140
+620
+100
+150
13
8
2
81.3%
50.0%
12.5%
23 47.9% 140 58.33%
6 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
6S
W
W
W
-100
+460
-100
+110
+530
+990
9
12
0
56.3%
75.0%
0.0%
21 43.8% 161 55.90%
7 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
10
11
12
3NT
2S
1NT
S
W
N
+100
-150
-150
+200
+100
+500
8
0
0
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8 16.7% 169 50.30%
8 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
16
17
18
4D
4H
3C
N
W
N
-130
-50
+100
+50
+200
+110
11
1
10
68.8%
6.3%
62.5%
22 45.8% 191 49.74%
9 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
22
23
24
6S
5Dx
2H
W
E
S
+1430
-1100
-110
+1430
+110
-110
16
0
11.4
100.0%
0.0%
71.1%
27.4 57.0% 218.4 50.55%
Back to the results
Pair EW2 - Adrian Darnell & Joe Bateman. Total = 223.4 : 51.71% : 3rd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
4
5
6
1NT
5D
4S
W
E
E
+90
+400
+650
+110
+530
+990
14
2
8
87.5%
12.5%
50.0%
24 50.0% 24 50.00%
2 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
10
11
12
3D
2H
2H
S
S
S
+100
-110
-140
+200
+100
+500
8
5
3
50.0%
31.3%
18.8%
16 33.3% 40 41.67%
3 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
16
17
18
4H
2H
1NT
W
E
S
-200
+200
+100
+50
+200
+110
5
16
10
31.3%
100.0%
62.5%
31 64.6% 71 49.31%
4 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
22
23
24
4S
3C
2S
W
W
N
+650
-100
-140
+1430
+110
-110
0
10
2.4
0.0%
62.5%
14.8%
12.4 25.8% 83.4 43.42%
5 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
1
2
3
4H
1NT
4S
N
N
N
-450
-120
+100
+100
+100
+300
9
6
11
56.3%
37.5%
68.8%
26 54.2% 109.4 45.57%
6 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
7
8
9
2S
2NT
2S
N
W
W
-110
+120
+140
+200
+150
+170
12
5
12
75.0%
31.3%
75.0%
29 60.4% 138.4 48.05%
7 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
13
14
15
3D
6S
4S
N
N
W
-110
-980
-50
+200
+50
+800
5
0
2
31.3%
0.0%
12.5%
7 14.6% 145.4 43.27%
8 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
19
20
21
1NT
5D
6NT
N
S
N
+50
+200
+400
+50
+200
+400
11
14
16
68.8%
87.5%
100.0%
41 85.4% 186.4 48.54%
9 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
25
26
27
4S
2S
4D
W
N
W
+620
-140
-100
+620
+100
+150
13
14
10
81.3%
87.5%
62.5%
37 77.1% 223.4 51.71%
Back to the results
Pair EW3 - Barbara Stott & Roger Chappel. Total = 205.4 : 47.54% : 6th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
7
8
9
3S
2NT
2S
W
W
W
-400
+120
+140
+200
+150
+170
4
5
12
25.0%
31.3%
75.0%
21 43.8% 21 43.75%
2 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
13
14
15
2S
4S
4Hx
E
N
N
-300
+50
+800
+200
+50
+800
0
15
16
0.0%
93.8%
100.0%
31 64.6% 52 54.17%
3 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
19
20
21
1NT
4D
7NT
N
N
N
+50
-130
+200
+50
+200
+400
11
4
12
68.8%
25.0%
75.0%
27 56.3% 79 54.86%
4 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
25
26
27
4S
2D
2H
W
S
N
+620
-150
+50
+620
+100
+150
13
12
13
81.3%
75.0%
81.3%
38 79.2% 117 60.94%
5 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
4S
W
W
E
-200
+430
+650
+110
+530
+990
2
6
8
12.5%
37.5%
50.0%
16 33.3% 133 55.42%
6 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
10
11
12
3C
2H
3H
S
S
N
-130
-140
-140
+200
+100
+500
2
2
3
12.5%
12.5%
18.8%
7 14.6% 140 48.61%
7 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
16
17
18
3NT
3H
1NT
E
W
S
-300
+140
-90
+50
+200
+110
0
8
2
0.0%
50.0%
12.5%
10 20.8% 150 44.64%
8 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
22
23
24
4S
3C
2H
W
W
N
+680
+110
-110
+1430
+110
-110
7
16
11.4
43.8%
100.0%
71.1%
34.4 71.6% 184.4 48.01%
9 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
1
2
3
3NT
1NT
4S
N
N
N
-460
-120
+100
+100
+100
+300
4
6
11
25.0%
37.5%
68.8%
21 43.8% 205.4 47.54%
Back to the results
Pair EW4 - Ruth Studholme & Guy Studholme. Total = 233.4 : 54.02% : 2nd/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
10
11
12
3NT
3H
3H
N
S
S
-600
+50
+100
+200
+100
+500
0
13
11
0.0%
81.3%
68.8%
24 50.0% 24 50.00%
2 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
16
17
18
3H
3H
1NT
W
W
S
-100
+170
+100
+50
+200
+110
14
14
10
87.5%
87.5%
62.5%
38 79.2% 62 64.58%
3 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
22
23
24
4S
2S
2H
W
S
S
+680
-140
-110
+1430
+110
-110
7
8
11.4
43.8%
50.0%
71.1%
26.4 54.9% 88.4 61.37%
4 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
1
2
3
4H
1NT
2S
N
N
S
-450
-120
-140
+100
+100
+300
9
6
4
56.3%
37.5%
25.0%
19 39.6% 107.4 55.92%
5 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
7
8
9
3S
1NT
3S
N
W
W
+200
+120
-100
+200
+150
+170
16
5
6
100.0%
31.3%
37.5%
27 56.3% 134.4 55.99%
6 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
13
14
15
2S
4S
3Hx
E
N
N
-200
+50
+500
+200
+50
+800
2
15
14
12.5%
93.8%
87.5%
31 64.6% 165.4 57.42%
7 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
19
20
21
1NT
5Dx
6NT
N
N
S
+50
+200
-1440
+50
+200
+400
11
14
0
68.8%
87.5%
0.0%
25 52.1% 190.4 56.66%
8 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
25
26
27
4S
3NT
2H
E
S
N
-100
-630
-140
+620
+100
+150
0
4
2
0.0%
25.0%
12.5%
6 12.5% 196.4 51.14%
9 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
4Sx
W
W
E
-100
+460
+990
+110
+530
+990
9
12
16
56.3%
75.0%
100.0%
37 77.1% 233.4 54.02%
Back to the results
Pair EW5 - Pat Braithwaite & Pat De Martino. Total = 185.0 : 42.82% : 8th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
13
14
15
3D
4S
3S
N
N
W
+100
-480
+140
+200
+50
+800
10
6
12
62.5%
37.5%
75.0%
28 58.3% 28 58.33%
2 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
19
20
21
2NT
5D
6NT
N
N
N
+50
+100
+100
+50
+200
+400
11
9
5
68.8%
56.3%
31.3%
25 52.1% 53 55.21%
3 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
25
26
27
2S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
+140
-660
-110
+620
+100
+150
5
0
7
31.3%
0.0%
43.8%
12 25.0% 65 45.14%
4 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
4
5
6
1NT
3NT
5S
W
W
E
-100
+430
+650
+110
+530
+990
9
6
8
56.3%
37.5%
50.0%
23 47.9% 88 45.83%
5 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
10
11
12
2H
2H
2H
N
S
N
+100
-110
+100
+200
+100
+500
8
5
11
50.0%
31.3%
68.8%
24 50.0% 112 46.67%
6 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
16
17
18
4H
2H
3C
W
E
N
-200
+140
+100
+50
+200
+110
5
8
10
31.3%
50.0%
62.5%
23 47.9% 135 46.88%
7 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
22
23
24
4S
5Cx
 
W
E
 
+680
-800
Ave
+1430
+110
-110
7
2
8
43.8%
12.5%
50.0%
17 35.4% 152 45.24%
8 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
1
2
3
4H
1NT
3S
N
N
N
-480
-90
-140
+100
+100
+300
0
14
4
0.0%
87.5%
25.0%
18 37.5% 170 44.27%
9 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
7
8
9
3Dx
2NT
4S
E
W
W
-1100
+150
-200
+200
+150
+170
0
13
2
0.0%
81.3%
12.5%
15 31.3% 185 42.82%
Back to the results
Pair EW6 - Roger Hancock & Jill Hancock. Total = 210.4 : 48.70% : 5th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
16
17
18
5D
3H
1NT
N
W
S
+50
+140
-90
+50
+200
+110
16
8
2
100.0%
50.0%
12.5%
26 54.2% 26 54.17%
2 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
22
23
24
4S
3H
2H
W
E
S
+680
-200
-140
+1430
+110
-110
7
6
2.4
43.8%
37.5%
14.8%
15.4 32.0% 41.4 43.10%
3 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
1
2
3
6NT
1NT
2S
N
N
N
+50
-150
-110
+100
+100
+300
13
1
8
81.3%
6.3%
50.0%
22 45.8% 63.4 44.01%
4 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
7
8
9
4H
2NT
2S
S
E
W
+100
+150
+140
+200
+150
+170
14
13
12
87.5%
81.3%
75.0%
39 81.3% 102.4 53.32%
5 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
13
14
15
3D
4NT
1S
N
E
W
-110
-500
+80
+200
+50
+800
5
4
6
31.3%
25.0%
37.5%
15 31.3% 117.4 48.91%
6 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
19
20
21
3C
5D
6NT
E
N
N
-100
+100
+100
+50
+200
+400
2
9
5
12.5%
56.3%
31.3%
16 33.3% 133.4 46.31%
7 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
25
26
27
2NT
3NT
2H
W
N
N
+120
-630
-140
+620
+100
+150
2
4
2
12.5%
25.0%
12.5%
8 16.7% 141.4 42.08%
8 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
4
5
6
1NT
3Sx
4S
E
W
E
-200
+530
+650
+110
+530
+990
2
16
8
12.5%
100.0%
50.0%
26 54.2% 167.4 43.59%
9 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
10
11
12
3NT
2H
4Hx
N
S
N
+200
+50
+500
+200
+100
+500
14
13
16
87.5%
81.3%
100.0%
43 89.6% 210.4 48.70%
Back to the results
Pair EW7 - Patricia Ellis & Chris Johnson. Total = 203.4 : 47.08% : 7th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
19
20
21
1NT
4D
6NT
N
N
N
+50
-130
+100
+50
+200
+400
11
4
5
68.8%
25.0%
31.3%
20 41.7% 20 41.67%
2 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
25
26
27
3NT
1NT
2S
W
N
S
+600
-210
-110
+620
+100
+150
8
10
7
50.0%
62.5%
43.8%
25 52.1% 45 46.88%
3 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
4
5
6
1NT
3D
4S
W
E
E
-100
+170
+650
+110
+530
+990
9
0
8
56.3%
0.0%
50.0%
17 35.4% 62 43.06%
4 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
10
11
12
2H
3H
1NT
N
S
N
+200
+100
-120
+200
+100
+500
14
16
6
87.5%
100.0%
37.5%
36 75.0% 98 51.04%
5 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
16
17
18
4H
3H
1NT
W
W
S
-200
+140
-90
+50
+200
+110
5
8
2
31.3%
50.0%
12.5%
15 31.3% 113 47.08%
6 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
22
23
24
5S
4S
2H
W
S
N
+680
+100
-110
+1430
+110
-110
7
13
11.4
43.8%
81.3%
71.1%
31.4 65.4% 144.4 50.13%
7 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
1
2
3
6NT
1NT
3S
N
N
S
+50
-150
-140
+100
+100
+300
13
1
4
81.3%
6.3%
25.0%
18 37.5% 162.4 48.33%
8 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
7
8
9
3C
2NT
4S
N
W
W
-170
+150
-200
+200
+150
+170
6
13
2
37.5%
81.3%
12.5%
21 43.8% 183.4 47.75%
9 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
13
14
15
2H
4S
4S
S
N
W
+100
-420
-50
+200
+50
+800
10
8
2
62.5%
50.0%
12.5%
20 41.7% 203.4 47.08%
Back to the results
Pair EW8 - Beverley Marriner & David Mills. Total = 147.4 : 34.11% : 9th/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
22
23
24
6D
5Cx
2H
E
W
S
+1370
-500
-140
+1430
+110
-110
14
4
2.4
87.5%
25.0%
14.8%
20.4 42.4% 20.4 42.45%
2 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
1
2
3
3NT
3S
4Hx
N
E
W
-460
-100
-200
+100
+100
+300
4
11
0
25.0%
68.8%
0.0%
15 31.3% 35.4 36.85%
3 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
7
8
9
3S
1NT
2S
W
W
W
-500
+90
+110
+200
+150
+170
2
0
8
12.5%
0.0%
50.0%
10 20.8% 45.4 31.51%
4 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
13
14
15
2H
4S
5C
S
N
E
+100
-510
-50
+200
+50
+800
10
2
2
62.5%
12.5%
12.5%
14 29.2% 59.4 30.92%
5 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
19
20
21
3C
4H
6NT
E
E
N
-100
-300
+100
+50
+200
+400
2
0
5
12.5%
0.0%
31.3%
7 14.6% 66.4 27.66%
6 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
25
26
27
3S
3NT
2H
W
N
N
+140
-630
+50
+620
+100
+150
5
4
13
31.3%
25.0%
81.3%
22 45.8% 88.4 30.69%
7 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
4
5
6
2NT
3NT
4S
W
W
E
-200
+430
+650
+110
+530
+990
2
6
8
12.5%
37.5%
50.0%
16 33.3% 104.4 31.06%
8 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
10
11
12
3C
3S
1NT
S
E
S
-110
-100
-90
+200
+100
+500
4
8
8
25.0%
50.0%
50.0%
20 41.7% 124.4 32.39%
9 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
16
17
18
4H
3H
3C
W
W
N
-200
+140
+100
+50
+200
+110
5
8
10
31.3%
50.0%
62.5%
23 47.9% 147.4 34.11%
Back to the results
Pair EW9 - Bohdan Hnyda & John Eglington. Total = 317.4 : 73.47% : 1st/9 : Top is 16.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Margaret Johnson
& Eileen Cotton
25
26
27
4H
3NT
3S
W
S
S
+620
+100
+150
+620
+100
+150
13
16
16
81.3%
100.0%
100.0%
45 93.8% 45 93.75%
2 Peter Burnip &
Margaret Smith
4
5
6
3D
3NT
4S
W
W
E
+110
+460
+650
+110
+530
+990
16
12
8
100.0%
75.0%
50.0%
36 75.0% 81 84.38%
3 Marian Wilson
& Gypsy Nichol
10
11
12
3NT
2S
3Hx
N
E
S
+200
-50
+200
+200
+100
+500
14
10
14
87.5%
62.5%
87.5%
38 79.2% 119 82.64%
4 Ted Murdoch &
Peter Williams
16
17
18
4D
4H
2S
N
W
E
-130
-50
+110
+50
+200
+110
11
1
16
68.8%
6.3%
100.0%
28 58.3% 147 76.56%
5 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
22
23
24
4S
3S
2H
W
S
N
+680
+100
-110
+1430
+110
-110
7
13
11.4
43.8%
81.3%
71.1%
31.4 65.4% 178.4 74.32%
6 Brian R Smith &
John Greaves
1
2
3
6NT
3C
4Sx
N
S
N
+100
+100
+300
+100
+100
+300
16
16
15
100.0%
100.0%
93.8%
47 97.9% 225.4 78.26%
7 Nigel Durie &
Pauline Durie
7
8
9
4C
1NT
2S
N
W
W
-130
+120
+170
+200
+150
+170
9
5
16
56.3%
31.3%
100.0%
30 62.5% 255.4 76.00%
8 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
13
14
15
3H
5D
1S
S
W
W
+200
-100
+110
+200
+50
+800
15
12
8
93.8%
75.0%
50.0%
35 72.9% 290.4 75.62%
9 Harald Volkmann
& Ros Wigham
19
20
21
2NT
4D
6NT
N
N
N
+50
-130
+200
+50
+200
+400
11
4
12
68.8%
25.0%
75.0%
27 56.3% 317.4 73.47%