St Georges Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Bridge with Lunch - July 4, 2017

5 tables - Mitchell Share and Relay

Back to the results
Pair 1 - Bev Godfrey & Frances Herschel. Total = 104.0 : 54.17% : 6th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 June Lowson &
Connie Wharton
1
2
3
4
NS
NS
NS
NS
3NT
2S
4H
5D
S
W
N
W
-50
+100
+420
-600
-50
+140
+420
+100
7
2
8
1
87.5%
25.0%
100.0%
12.5%
18 56.3% 18 56.25%
2 Christine Bainbridge
& Derek Bainbridge
5
6
7
8
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
1NT
4D
2C
S
E
W
E
-100
+300
-130
-130
+90
+300
-130
+500
3
6
5
0
37.5%
75.0%
62.5%
0.0%
14 43.8% 32 50.00%
3 Jane Diamond
& Kath Siday
9
10
11
12
NS
NS
NS
NS
2H
1D
3NT
3NT
E
E
N
N
-140
-90
+400
+600
-140
+200
+400
+630
4
5
6
4
50.0%
62.5%
75.0%
50.0%
19 59.4% 51 53.13%
4 Chris Hope &
Joe Bateman
13
14
15
16
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
2C
5S
5S
E
S
S
N
-90
-50
-100
+480
+100
+90
+690
+980
4
4
0
4
50.0%
50.0%
0.0%
50.0%
12 37.5% 63 49.22%
5 Alice Harrison
& Valerie Allan
17
18
19
20
NS
NS
NS
NS
3S
2S
4S
4H
E
E
N
S
-170
+100
+420
+620
-50
+110
+420
+1100
6
5
7
4
75.0%
62.5%
87.5%
50.0%
22 68.8% 85 53.13%
6 Bobbie Watchman
& Joan Coe
21
22
23
24
EW
EW
EW
EW
3S
3NT
3S
3NT
S
S
N
N
+200
-400
-140
-400
+470
-400
-100
+50
4
6
6
3
50.0%
75.0%
75.0%
37.5%
19 59.4% 104 54.17%
Back to the results
Pair 2 - Bob Watts & Nichola Cockerill-Smith. Total = 102.0 : 53.13% : 7th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bobbie Watchman
& Joan Coe
5
6
7
8
NS
NS
NS
NS
3H
1NT
4D
3Sx
S
E
W
W
-100
+200
-130
+500
+90
+300
-130
+500
3
2
5
8
37.5%
25.0%
62.5%
100.0%
18 56.3% 18 56.25%
2 June Lowson &
Connie Wharton
9
10
11
12
NS
NS
NS
NS
2H
3D
3NT
4H
E
E
S
N
-140
+200
+400
-300
-140
+200
+400
+630
4
8
6
0
50.0%
100.0%
75.0%
0.0%
18 56.3% 36 56.25%
3 Christine Bainbridge
& Derek Bainbridge
13
14
15
16
NS
NS
NS
NS
2H
1NT
3NT
6S
S
S
S
N
-100
+90
+690
+980
+100
+90
+690
+980
0
8
8
7
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
87.5%
23 71.9% 59 61.46%
4 Jane Diamond
& Kath Siday
17
18
19
20
NS
NS
NS
NS
4H
2H
2S
4H
N
S
N
S
-50
+110
+170
+620
-50
+110
+420
+1100
8
8
2
4
100.0%
100.0%
25.0%
50.0%
22 68.8% 81 63.28%
5 Chris Hope &
Joe Bateman
21
22
23
24
NS
NS
NS
NS
3Dx
3NT
4C
3NT
W
S
E
N
-470
+400
+100
-50
-100
+430
+620
+400
0
2
0
0
0.0%
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2 6.3% 83 51.88%
6 Alice Harrison
& Valerie Allan
1
2
3
4
EW
EW
EW
EW
3NT
3Sx
4H
2D
S
W
N
W
+100
-100
+50
+150
+500
-100
+50
+600
5
6
5
3
62.5%
75.0%
62.5%
37.5%
19 59.4% 102 53.13%
Back to the results
Pair 3 - Audrey Spencer & Anne Welsh. Total = 111.0 : 57.81% : 2nd/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Alice Harrison
& Valerie Allan
9
10
11
12
NS
NS
NS
NS
2H
3D
3NT
3NT
E
E
N
N
-140
-110
+400
+600
-140
+200
+400
+630
4
1
6
4
50.0%
12.5%
75.0%
50.0%
15 46.9% 15 46.88%
2 Bobbie Watchman
& Joan Coe
13
14
15
16
NS
NS
NS
NS
2D
1NT
3NT
6S
W
S
S
N
-90
-150
+600
-50
+100
+90
+690
+980
4
0
2
1
50.0%
0.0%
25.0%
12.5%
7 21.9% 22 34.38%
3 June Lowson &
Connie Wharton
17
18
19
20
NS
NS
NS
NS
4S
2S
4S
6Dx
E
E
N
E
-480
+100
+420
+1100
-50
+110
+420
+1100
0
5
7
8
0.0%
62.5%
87.5%
100.0%
20 62.5% 42 43.75%
4 Christine Bainbridge
& Derek Bainbridge
21
22
23
24
NS
NS
NS
NS
4H
3NT
5C
3NT
N
S
E
S
-200
+430
+200
+400
-100
+430
+620
+400
4
7
4
5
50.0%
87.5%
50.0%
62.5%
20 62.5% 62 48.44%
5 Jane Diamond
& Kath Siday
1
2
3
4
NS
NS
NS
NS
3C
1H
4H
3NT
N
S
N
E
-100
+140
-50
+100
-50
+140
+420
+100
3
8
3
8
37.5%
100.0%
37.5%
100.0%
22 68.8% 84 52.50%
6 Chris Hope &
Joe Bateman
5
6
7
8
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
1NT
5D
2S
S
E
W
W
+200
-100
+600
-100
+200
-100
+600
+130
8
8
8
3
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
37.5%
27 84.4% 111 57.81%
Back to the results
Pair 4 - Liz Reese & Hayden Dando. Total = 108.0 : 56.25% : 3rd/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Chris Hope &
Joe Bateman
17
18
19
20
NS
NS
NS
NS
4S
3NT
3C
4H
E
N
W
S
-420
-200
-110
+620
-50
+110
+420
+1100
2
0
0
4
25.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
6 18.8% 6 18.75%
2 Alice Harrison
& Valerie Allan
21
22
23
24
NS
NS
NS
NS
2H
3NT
5Cx
3NT
N
S
E
S
-100
+430
+500
+400
-100
+430
+620
+400
8
7
6
5
100.0%
87.5%
75.0%
62.5%
26 81.3% 32 50.00%
3 Bobbie Watchman
& Joan Coe
1
2
3
4
NS
NS
NS
NS
3C
2H
4H
5D
N
S
N
W
-50
+110
-50
-600
-50
+140
+420
+100
7
6
3
1
87.5%
75.0%
37.5%
12.5%
17 53.1% 49 51.04%
4 June Lowson &
Connie Wharton
5
6
7
8
NS
NS
NS
NS
Pass
1NT
3D
2S
 
E
W
W
Pass
+300
-130
+100
+90
+300
-130
+500
6
6
5
5
75.0%
75.0%
62.5%
62.5%
22 68.8% 71 55.47%
5 Christine Bainbridge
& Derek Bainbridge
9
10
11
12
NS
NS
NS
NS
3H
2D
3NT
3NT
E
E
S
S
-140
-90
-50
+630
-140
+200
+400
+630
4
5
1
8
50.0%
62.5%
12.5%
100.0%
18 56.3% 89 55.63%
6 Jane Diamond
& Kath Siday
13
14
15
16
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
1NT
3NT
4H
E
S
S
S
+90
+50
-630
+50
+100
+150
+100
+50
4
4
4
7
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
87.5%
19 59.4% 108 56.25%
Back to the results
Pair 5 - Andrew Simmons & Christine Simmons. Total = 107.0 : 55.73% : 4th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Jane Diamond
& Kath Siday
21
22
23
24
NS
NS
NS
NS
4S
3NT
4H
3NT
S
S
S
S
-200
+400
+620
+400
-100
+430
+620
+400
4
2
8
5
50.0%
25.0%
100.0%
62.5%
19 59.4% 19 59.38%
2 Chris Hope &
Joe Bateman
1
2
3
4
NS
NS
NS
NS
4Cx
2S
4H
2D
N
W
N
W
-500
+100
-50
-150
-50
+140
+420
+100
0
2
3
5
0.0%
25.0%
37.5%
62.5%
10 31.3% 29 45.31%
3 Alice Harrison
& Valerie Allan
5
6
7
8
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
1NT
4D
2S
S
E
W
W
+90
+300
-130
+50
+90
+300
-130
+500
8
6
5
2
100.0%
75.0%
62.5%
25.0%
21 65.6% 50 52.08%
4 Bobbie Watchman
& Joan Coe
9
10
11
12
NS
NS
NS
NS
3H
2D
3NT
3NT
E
E
S
N
-140
-110
-50
+600
-140
+200
+400
+630
4
1
1
4
50.0%
12.5%
12.5%
50.0%
10 31.3% 60 46.88%
5 June Lowson &
Connie Wharton
13
14
15
16
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
1NT
3NT
6S
E
S
S
N
+100
-50
+660
+980
+100
+90
+690
+980
8
4
6
7
100.0%
50.0%
75.0%
87.5%
25 78.1% 85 53.13%
6 Christine Bainbridge
& Derek Bainbridge
17
18
19
20
EW
EW
EW
EW
3S
3NT
5D
5H
E
S
W
S
+200
+100
-400
+100
+480
+200
+110
+100
4
6
4
8
50.0%
75.0%
50.0%
100.0%
22 68.8% 107 55.73%
Back to the results
Pair 7 - June Lowson & Connie Wharton. Total = 68.4 : 35.63% : 10th=/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
1
2
3
4
EW
EW
EW
EW
3NT
2S
4H
5D
S
W
N
W
+50
-100
-420
+600
+500
-100
+50
+600
1
6
0
7
12.5%
75.0%
0.0%
87.5%
14 43.8% 14 43.75%
2 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
9
10
11
12
EW
EW
EW
EW
2H
3D
3NT
4H
E
E
S
N
+140
-200
-400
+300
+140
+110
+50
+300
4
0
2
8
50.0%
0.0%
25.0%
100.0%
14 43.8% 28 43.75%
3 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
17
18
19
20
EW
EW
EW
EW
4S
2S
4S
6Dx
E
E
N
E
+480
-100
-420
-1100
+480
+200
+110
+100
8
3
1
0
100.0%
37.5%
12.5%
0.0%
12 37.5% 40 41.67%
4 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
5
6
7
8
EW
EW
EW
EW
Pass
1NT
3D
2S
 
E
W
W
Pass
-300
+130
-100
+200
-100
+600
+130
2
2
3
3
25.0%
25.0%
37.5%
37.5%
10 31.3% 50 39.06%
5 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
13
14
15
16
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
1NT
3NT
6S
E
S
S
N
-100
+50
-660
-980
+100
+150
+100
+50
0
4
2
1
0.0%
50.0%
25.0%
12.5%
7 21.9% 57 35.63%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 11.4 35.6% 68.4 35.63%
Back to the results
Pair 8 - Bobbie Watchman & Joan Coe. Total = 106.8 : 55.63% : 5th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
5
6
7
8
EW
EW
EW
EW
3H
1NT
4D
3Sx
S
E
W
W
+100
-200
+130
-500
+200
-100
+600
+130
5
6
3
0
62.5%
75.0%
37.5%
0.0%
14 43.8% 14 43.75%
2 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
13
14
15
16
EW
EW
EW
EW
2D
1NT
3NT
6S
W
S
S
N
+90
+150
-600
+50
+100
+150
+100
+50
4
8
6
7
50.0%
100.0%
75.0%
87.5%
25 78.1% 39 60.94%
3 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
1
2
3
4
EW
EW
EW
EW
3C
2H
4H
5D
N
S
N
W
+50
-110
+50
+600
+500
-100
+50
+600
1
2
5
7
12.5%
25.0%
62.5%
87.5%
15 46.9% 54 56.25%
4 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
9
10
11
12
EW
EW
EW
EW
3H
2D
3NT
3NT
E
E
S
N
+140
+110
+50
-600
+140
+110
+50
+300
4
7
7
4
50.0%
87.5%
87.5%
50.0%
22 68.8% 76 59.38%
6 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
21
22
23
24
NS
NS
NS
NS
3S
3NT
3S
3NT
S
S
N
N
-200
+400
+140
+400
-100
+430
+620
+400
4
2
2
5
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
62.5%
13 40.6% 89 55.63%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 17.8 55.6% 106.8 55.63%
Back to the results
Pair 9 - Alice Harrison & Valerie Allan. Total = 68.4 : 35.63% : 10th=/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
9
10
11
12
EW
EW
EW
EW
2H
3D
3NT
3NT
E
E
N
N
+140
+110
-400
-600
+140
+110
+50
+300
4
7
2
4
50.0%
87.5%
25.0%
50.0%
17 53.1% 17 53.13%
2 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
21
22
23
24
EW
EW
EW
EW
2H
3NT
5Cx
3NT
N
S
E
S
+100
-430
-500
-400
+470
-400
-100
+50
0
1
2
3
0.0%
12.5%
25.0%
37.5%
6 18.8% 23 35.94%
3 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
5
6
7
8
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
1NT
4D
2S
S
E
W
W
-90
-300
+130
-50
+200
-100
+600
+130
0
2
3
6
0.0%
25.0%
37.5%
75.0%
11 34.4% 34 35.42%
5 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
17
18
19
20
EW
EW
EW
EW
3S
2S
4S
4H
E
E
N
S
+170
-100
-420
-620
+480
+200
+110
+100
2
3
1
4
25.0%
37.5%
12.5%
50.0%
10 31.3% 44 34.38%
6 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
1
2
3
4
NS
NS
NS
NS
3NT
3Sx
4H
2D
S
W
N
W
-100
+100
-50
-150
-50
+140
+420
+100
3
2
3
5
37.5%
25.0%
37.5%
62.5%
13 40.6% 57 35.63%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 11.4 35.6% 68.4 35.63%
Back to the results
Pair 10 - Chris Hope & Joe Bateman. Total = 123.6 : 64.38% : 1st/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
17
18
19
20
EW
EW
EW
EW
4S
3NT
3C
4H
E
N
W
S
+420
+200
+110
-620
+480
+200
+110
+100
6
8
8
4
75.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
26 81.3% 26 81.25%
2 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
1
2
3
4
EW
EW
EW
EW
4Cx
2S
4H
2D
N
W
N
W
+500
-100
+50
+150
+500
-100
+50
+600
8
6
5
3
100.0%
75.0%
62.5%
37.5%
22 68.8% 48 75.00%
4 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
13
14
15
16
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
2C
5S
5S
E
S
S
N
+90
+50
+100
-480
+100
+150
+100
+50
4
4
8
4
50.0%
50.0%
100.0%
50.0%
20 62.5% 68 70.83%
5 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
21
22
23
24
EW
EW
EW
EW
3Dx
3NT
4C
3NT
W
S
E
N
+470
-400
-100
+50
+470
-400
-100
+50
8
6
8
8
100.0%
75.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 93.8% 98 76.56%
6 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
5
6
7
8
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
1NT
5D
2S
S
E
W
W
-200
+100
-600
+100
+90
+300
-130
+500
0
0
0
5
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
62.5%
5 15.6% 103 64.38%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 20.6 64.4% 123.6 64.37%
Back to the results
Pair 11 - Jane Diamond & Kath Siday. Total = 70.8 : 36.88% : 9th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
21
22
23
24
EW
EW
EW
EW
4S
3NT
4H
3NT
S
S
S
S
+200
-400
-620
-400
+470
-400
-100
+50
4
6
0
3
50.0%
75.0%
0.0%
37.5%
13 40.6% 13 40.63%
3 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
9
10
11
12
EW
EW
EW
EW
2H
1D
3NT
3NT
E
E
N
N
+140
+90
-400
-600
+140
+110
+50
+300
4
3
2
4
50.0%
37.5%
25.0%
50.0%
13 40.6% 26 40.63%
4 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
17
18
19
20
EW
EW
EW
EW
4H
2H
2S
4H
N
S
N
S
+50
-110
-170
-620
+480
+200
+110
+100
0
0
6
4
0.0%
0.0%
75.0%
50.0%
10 31.3% 36 37.50%
5 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
1
2
3
4
EW
EW
EW
EW
3C
1H
4H
3NT
N
S
N
E
+100
-140
+50
-100
+500
-100
+50
+600
5
0
5
0
62.5%
0.0%
62.5%
0.0%
10 31.3% 46 35.94%
6 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
13
14
15
16
NS
NS
NS
NS
1NT
1NT
3NT
4H
E
S
S
S
-90
-50
+630
-50
+100
+90
+690
+980
4
4
4
1
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
12.5%
13 40.6% 59 36.88%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 11.8 36.9% 70.8 36.88%
Back to the results
Pair 12 - Christine Bainbridge & Derek Bainbridge. Total = 75.6 : 39.38% : 8th/11 : Top is 8.
Round Versus Board As Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
2 Bev Godfrey &
Frances Herschel
5
6
7
8
EW
EW
EW
EW
1NT
1NT
4D
2C
S
E
W
E
+100
-300
+130
+130
+200
-100
+600
+130
5
2
3
8
62.5%
25.0%
37.5%
100.0%
18 56.3% 18 56.25%
3 Bob Watts &
Nichola Cockerill-Smith
13
14
15
16
EW
EW
EW
EW
2H
1NT
3NT
6S
S
S
S
N
+100
-90
-690
-980
+100
+150
+100
+50
8
0
0
1
100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
9 28.1% 27 42.19%
4 Audrey Spencer
& Anne Welsh
21
22
23
24
EW
EW
EW
EW
4H
3NT
5C
3NT
N
S
E
S
+200
-430
-200
-400
+470
-400
-100
+50
4
1
4
3
50.0%
12.5%
50.0%
37.5%
12 37.5% 39 40.63%
5 Liz Reese &
Hayden Dando
9
10
11
12
EW
EW
EW
EW
3H
2D
3NT
3NT
E
E
S
S
+140
+90
+50
-630
+140
+110
+50
+300
4
3
7
0
50.0%
37.5%
87.5%
0.0%
14 43.8% 53 41.41%
6 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
17
18
19
20
NS
NS
NS
NS
3S
3NT
5D
5H
E
S
W
S
-200
-100
+400
-100
-50
+110
+420
+1100
4
2
4
0
50.0%
25.0%
50.0%
0.0%
10 31.3% 63 39.38%
  Adjustment for sitting out                 12.6 39.4% 75.6 39.37%