Hurworth Bridge Club

Home Results Index Results and Travellers

Clive Owen Quaich 6 - April 28, 2017

10 tables - Skip Mitchell

Back to the results
Pair NS1 - Christine Bainbridge & Pat Robinson. Total = 179.0 : 53.27% : 4th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
1
2
3
3Hx
6S
3D
W
E
W
+500
-980
+100
+500
-200
+200
14
0
5
100.0%
0.0%
35.7%
19 45.2% 19 45.24%
2 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
4
5
6
3D
6NT
1NT
N
N
E
+150
+1440
-210
+240
+1440
+100
12
14
6
85.7%
100.0%
42.9%
32 76.2% 51 60.71%
3 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
7
8
9
2S
3NT
2S
W
N
N
+100
+430
-50
+200
+430
+200
8
14
10
57.1%
100.0%
71.4%
32 76.2% 83 65.87%
4 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
10
11
12
2NT
2C
2NT
N
N
W
+120
+130
+150
+630
+400
+250
4
12
11
28.6%
85.7%
78.6%
27 64.3% 110 65.48%
5 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
13
14
15
2NT
1S
2H
W
S
N
-180
+110
+110
+200
+470
+150
4
8
8
28.6%
57.1%
57.1%
20 47.6% 130 61.90%
6 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
16
17
18
4S
4S
1NT
E
W
W
-650
-480
+100
+100
+100
+150
5
3
4
35.7%
21.4%
28.6%
12 28.6% 142 56.35%
7 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
19
20
21
3NT
5D
4S
W
W
S
-600
-620
+620
-130
-130
+680
11
9
6
78.6%
64.3%
42.9%
26 61.9% 168 57.14%
8 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
22
23
24
3H
3NT
3NT
W
S
W
+100
-300
-460
+200
+600
+50
6
2
3
42.9%
14.3%
21.4%
11 26.2% 179 53.27%
Back to the results
Pair NS2 - Pauline Hall & Linda Davison. Total = 166.0 : 49.40% : 7th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
4
5
6
2S
4S
3NT
W
N
E
+100
+650
-660
+240
+1440
+100
2
0
0
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2 4.8% 2 4.76%
2 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
7
8
9
4C
1S
3H
E
E
E
+200
-110
-140
+200
+430
+200
14
4
2
100.0%
28.6%
14.3%
20 47.6% 22 26.19%
3 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
10
11
12
3NT
3C
3NT
N
N
W
+630
+110
+250
+630
+400
+250
11
8
14
78.6%
57.1%
100.0%
33 78.6% 55 43.65%
4 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
13
14
15
3NT
3S
2H
W
S
N
-630
+170
-100
+200
+470
+150
0
11
0
0.0%
78.6%
0.0%
11 26.2% 66 39.29%
5 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
16
17
18
4S
6S
2S
E
E
S
-650
-980
+110
+100
+100
+150
5
0
6
35.7%
0.0%
42.9%
11 26.2% 77 36.67%
6 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
19
20
21
3C
3NT
4S
W
W
S
-130
-660
+620
-130
-130
+680
14
3
6
100.0%
21.4%
42.9%
23 54.8% 100 39.68%
7 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
22
23
24
3C
5D
5C
E
N
W
+200
+600
-420
+200
+600
+50
12
13
9
85.7%
92.9%
64.3%
34 81.0% 134 45.58%
8 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
25
26
27
4S
5C
4D
W
N
W
+200
+600
+150
+200
+600
+500
14
11
7
100.0%
78.6%
50.0%
32 76.2% 166 49.40%
Back to the results
Pair NS3 - Marian Wilson & Isobel Rooney. Total = 130.0 : 38.69% : 9th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
7
8
9
2S
3S
2NT
W
E
W
-110
+100
-150
+200
+430
+200
3
10
0
21.4%
71.4%
0.0%
13 31.0% 13 30.95%
2 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
10
11
12
3C
2D
2NT
N
E
W
+130
+50
+50
+630
+400
+250
6
4
3
42.9%
28.6%
21.4%
13 31.0% 26 30.95%
3 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
13
14
15
2NT
3S
2H
W
S
N
-120
-50
+110
+200
+470
+150
11
5
8
78.6%
35.7%
57.1%
24 57.1% 50 39.68%
4 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
16
17
18
4S
4S
1NT
E
W
W
-650
-450
+150
+100
+100
+150
5
7
13
35.7%
50.0%
92.9%
25 59.5% 75 44.64%
5 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
19
20
21
3NT
5D
3S
W
W
S
-630
-620
+200
-130
-130
+680
4
9
2
28.6%
64.3%
14.3%
15 35.7% 90 42.86%
6 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
22
23
24
5D
2D
5C
S
N
W
-150
+150
-420
+200
+600
+50
0
8
9
0.0%
57.1%
64.3%
17 40.5% 107 42.46%
7 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
25
26
27
2S
3C
3D
W
N
W
-110
+150
+50
+200
+600
+500
4
3
4
28.6%
21.4%
28.6%
11 26.2% 118 40.14%
8 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
28
29
30
3NT
7H
3NT
E
E
S
-400
-2210
+460
+50
-710
+520
6
0
6
42.9%
0.0%
42.9%
12 28.6% 130 38.69%
Back to the results
Pair NS4 - Maurice Denham & Dot Denham. Total = 173.0 : 51.49% : 6th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
10
11
12
3NT
2C
4C
S
N
W
+630
+110
+50
+630
+400
+250
11
8
3
78.6%
57.1%
21.4%
22 52.4% 22 52.38%
2 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
13
14
15
2NT
2Sx
2D
W
S
W
-150
+470
-90
+200
+470
+150
6
14
2
42.9%
100.0%
14.3%
22 52.4% 44 52.38%
3 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
16
17
18
4S
4S
2H
E
E
S
-650
-420
+140
+100
+100
+150
5
10
9
35.7%
71.4%
64.3%
24 57.1% 68 53.97%
4 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
19
20
21
3NT
3D
4S
W
E
S
-630
-170
+620
-130
-130
+680
4
12
6
28.6%
85.7%
42.9%
22 52.4% 90 53.57%
5 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
22
23
24
2S
2H
6NT
W
N
W
+200
+200
+50
+200
+600
+50
12
10
14
85.7%
71.4%
100.0%
36 85.7% 126 60.00%
6 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
25
26
27
1S
3C
3H
W
N
S
-110
+170
+170
+200
+600
+500
4
6
11
28.6%
42.9%
78.6%
21 50.0% 147 58.33%
7 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
E
E
S
-430
-1460
+430
+50
-710
+520
1
6
0
7.1%
42.9%
0.0%
7 16.7% 154 52.38%
8 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
1
2
3
5D
4S
5D
N
E
W
-200
-480
+200
+500
-200
+200
0
5
14
0.0%
35.7%
100.0%
19 45.2% 173 51.49%
Back to the results
Pair NS5 - Bruce Heather & Freda Heather. Total = 152.0 : 45.24% : 8th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
13
14
15
3NT
4S
3D
W
S
W
-600
-100
+50
+200
+470
+150
2
1
4
14.3%
7.1%
28.6%
7 16.7% 7 16.67%
2 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
16
17
18
4S
4D
1NT
E
S
W
-650
-100
+150
+100
+100
+150
5
12
13
35.7%
85.7%
92.9%
30 71.4% 37 44.05%
3 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
2NT
W
W
S
-630
-660
+150
-130
-130
+680
4
3
0
28.6%
21.4%
0.0%
7 16.7% 44 34.92%
4 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
22
23
24
2NT
3NT
3NT
S
S
E
-50
-400
-490
+200
+600
+50
2
0
0
14.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2 4.8% 46 27.38%
5 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
25
26
27
3S
4C
5Dx
W
N
W
+100
+150
+500
+200
+600
+500
10
3
14
71.4%
21.4%
100.0%
27 64.3% 73 34.76%
6 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
E
E
N
-400
-1430
+460
+50
-710
+520
6
12
6
42.9%
85.7%
42.9%
24 57.1% 97 38.49%
7 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
1
2
3
2D
3S
3S
N
E
S
+90
-200
+140
+500
-200
+200
6
14
12
42.9%
100.0%
85.7%
32 76.2% 129 43.88%
8 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
4
5
6
2D
4S
3C
N
N
W
+130
+680
-170
+240
+1440
+100
8
5
10
57.1%
35.7%
71.4%
23 54.8% 152 45.24%
Back to the results
Pair NS6 - Veronica Fuller & Marjorie Lockett. Total = 175.0 : 52.08% : 5th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
16
17
18
4S
4S
3NT
E
E
N
-620
-450
-400
+100
+100
+150
12
7
0
85.7%
50.0%
0.0%
19 45.2% 19 45.24%
2 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
4S
W
W
S
-630
-660
+680
-130
-130
+680
4
3
14
28.6%
21.4%
100.0%
21 50.0% 40 47.62%
3 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
22
23
24
2S
Pass
3NT
W
 
E
+100
Pass
-460
+200
+600
+50
6
6
3
42.9%
42.9%
21.4%
15 35.7% 55 43.65%
4 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
25
26
27
2S
3NT
3H
W
N
S
-110
+600
+170
+200
+600
+500
4
11
11
28.6%
78.6%
78.6%
26 61.9% 81 48.21%
5 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
28
29
30
5C
6H
3NT
E
W
N
+50
-1460
+460
+50
-710
+520
14
6
6
100.0%
42.9%
42.9%
26 61.9% 107 50.95%
6 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
1
2
3
3D
4S
2S
N
E
S
-150
-420
+110
+500
-200
+200
2
11
10
14.3%
78.6%
71.4%
23 54.8% 130 51.59%
7 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
4
5
6
3D
4S
3C
N
N
W
+130
+680
-170
+240
+1440
+100
8
5
10
57.1%
35.7%
71.4%
23 54.8% 153 52.04%
8 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
7
8
9
2H
5C
2S
S
S
N
+110
-150
-50
+200
+430
+200
10
2
10
71.4%
14.3%
71.4%
22 52.4% 175 52.08%
Back to the results
Pair NS7 - Margaret Young & Brian Dawson. Total = 211.0 : 62.80% : 1st/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
19
20
21
3NT
3D
4S
W
E
S
-600
-130
+650
-130
-130
+680
11
14
11
78.6%
100.0%
78.6%
36 85.7% 36 85.71%
2 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
22
23
24
3S
3NT
5C
W
S
W
+200
+600
-420
+200
+600
+50
12
13
9
85.7%
92.9%
64.3%
34 81.0% 70 83.33%
3 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
25
26
27
2S
5C
5D
W
N
W
-110
+600
+150
+200
+600
+500
4
11
7
28.6%
78.6%
50.0%
22 52.4% 92 73.02%
4 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
28
29
30
2NT
4H
3NT
E
E
S
-180
-710
+490
+50
-710
+520
10
14
11
71.4%
100.0%
78.6%
35 83.3% 127 75.60%
5 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
1
2
3
4S
3NT
3D
S
W
W
-50
-520
-110
+500
-200
+200
4
2
0
28.6%
14.3%
0.0%
6 14.3% 133 63.33%
6 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
4
5
6
2D
6S
3NT
N
N
E
+110
+1430
-630
+240
+1440
+100
4
11
2
28.6%
78.6%
14.3%
17 40.5% 150 59.52%
7 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
7
8
9
2H
3D
3NT
S
N
W
+140
-100
+200
+200
+430
+200
12
7
14
85.7%
50.0%
100.0%
33 78.6% 183 62.24%
8 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
10
11
12
3NT
3NT
2NT
N
N
W
+630
+400
+50
+630
+400
+250
11
14
3
78.6%
100.0%
21.4%
28 66.7% 211 62.80%
Back to the results
Pair NS8 - Julia Palmieri & Eileen Lorimer. Total = 127.0 : 37.80% : 10th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
22
23
24
2S
3NT
5C
W
S
W
+100
-100
-420
+200
+600
+50
6
4
9
42.9%
28.6%
64.3%
19 45.2% 19 45.24%
2 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
25
26
27
2S
5C
4H
W
N
S
-110
+600
-50
+200
+600
+500
4
11
1
28.6%
78.6%
7.1%
16 38.1% 35 41.67%
3 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
28
29
30
3NT
6H
4S
E
E
N
-430
-1460
+450
+50
-710
+520
1
6
2
7.1%
42.9%
14.3%
9 21.4% 44 34.92%
4 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
1
2
3
4S
4S
3D
S
E
W
+420
-480
+100
+500
-200
+200
12
5
5
85.7%
35.7%
35.7%
22 52.4% 66 39.29%
5 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
4
5
6
2S
4S
4S
W
N
W
-140
+680
+100
+240
+1440
+100
0
5
14
0.0%
35.7%
100.0%
19 45.2% 85 40.48%
6 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
7
8
9
2S
4C
2Sx
W
S
N
-110
-100
-100
+200
+430
+200
3
7
6
21.4%
50.0%
42.9%
16 38.1% 101 40.08%
7 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
10
11
12
5D
4C
2NT
S
N
W
-200
-50
+50
+630
+400
+250
2
1
3
14.3%
7.1%
21.4%
6 14.3% 107 36.39%
8 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
13
14
15
1NT
4S
2H
W
S
N
-120
-100
+110
+200
+470
+150
11
1
8
78.6%
7.1%
57.1%
20 47.6% 127 37.80%
Back to the results
Pair NS9 - Sheila Pullin & Martin Thompson. Total = 186.0 : 55.36% : 2nd/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
25
26
27
3D
3NT
4H
S
N
S
+130
-100
-50
+200
+600
+500
12
0
1
85.7%
0.0%
7.1%
13 31.0% 13 30.95%
2 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
W
W
S
-400
-1460
+520
+50
-710
+520
6
6
14
42.9%
42.9%
100.0%
26 61.9% 39 46.43%
3 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
1
2
3
3S
4S
4D
S
E
W
+170
-420
+100
+500
-200
+200
10
11
5
71.4%
78.6%
35.7%
26 61.9% 65 51.59%
4 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
4
5
6
1NT
6S
4C
S
N
W
+240
+1430
-170
+240
+1440
+100
14
11
10
100.0%
78.6%
71.4%
35 83.3% 100 59.52%
5 Eileen Cotton
& Joe Bateman
7
8
9
2S
4H
2S
W
W
N
-110
-420
-50
+200
+430
+200
3
0
10
21.4%
0.0%
71.4%
13 31.0% 113 53.81%
6 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
10
11
12
5D
3C
3NT
S
N
W
-300
+110
+150
+630
+400
+250
0
8
11
0.0%
57.1%
78.6%
19 45.2% 132 52.38%
7 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
13
14
15
2S
3S
3D
E
S
W
+200
-50
+150
+200
+470
+150
14
5
14
100.0%
35.7%
100.0%
33 78.6% 165 56.12%
8 Dee Bell &
Ann Paton
16
17
18
4S
5C
1NT
E
W
W
-650
+100
-120
+100
+100
+150
5
14
2
35.7%
100.0%
14.3%
21 50.0% 186 55.36%
Back to the results
Pair NS10 - Andrew Simmons & Christine Simmons. Total = 181.0 : 53.87% : 3rd/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Howard Coutts
& Kath Siday
28
29
30
1NT
6H
3NT
E
E
S
-150
-1460
+490
+50
-710
+520
12
6
11
85.7%
42.9%
78.6%
29 69.0% 29 69.05%
2 Colin Graham &
Brian Fleetham
1
2
3
2S
4S
3D
N
E
W
+140
-450
+100
+500
-200
+200
8
8
5
57.1%
57.1%
35.7%
21 50.0% 50 59.52%
3 Connie Wharton &
Dorothy Ritzema
4
5
6
2D
5S
3NT
N
N
E
+130
+680
-600
+240
+1440
+100
8
5
4
57.1%
35.7%
28.6%
17 40.5% 67 53.17%
4 Margaret Lewis &
Monica Spencer
7
8
9
2S
3S
2H
W
E
W
-110
+150
-110
+200
+430
+200
3
12
4
21.4%
85.7%
28.6%
19 45.2% 86 51.19%
5 Shirley Sanders
& Jean Hattersley
10
11
12
3NT
5C
2D
N
N
N
+630
-50
+110
+630
+400
+250
11
1
8
78.6%
7.1%
57.1%
20 47.6% 106 50.48%
6 Martin Blindell
& Andy Keir
13
14
15
1S
3S
1H
E
S
N
-140
+170
+140
+200
+470
+150
8
11
12
57.1%
78.6%
85.7%
31 73.8% 137 54.37%
7 Mike Brennan
& Dennis Scott
16
17
18
5S
4S
3S
E
E
N
+100
-480
+140
+100
+100
+150
14
3
9
100.0%
21.4%
64.3%
26 61.9% 163 55.44%
8 Maurice Willcock &
Margaret Maidment
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
4S
W
W
S
-630
-660
+650
-130
-130
+680
4
3
11
28.6%
21.4%
78.6%
18 42.9% 181 53.87%
Back to the results
Pair EW1 - Dee Bell & Ann Paton. Total = 180.0 : 53.57% : 4th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
1
2
3
3Hx
6S
3D
W
E
W
-500
+980
-100
+200
+980
+110
0
14
9
0.0%
100.0%
64.3%
23 54.8% 23 54.76%
2 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
7
8
9
4C
1S
3H
E
E
E
-200
+110
+140
+110
+420
+150
0
10
12
0.0%
71.4%
85.7%
22 52.4% 45 53.57%
3 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
13
14
15
2NT
3S
2H
W
S
N
+120
+50
-110
+630
+100
+100
3
9
6
21.4%
64.3%
42.9%
18 42.9% 63 50.00%
4 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
19
20
21
3NT
3D
4S
W
E
S
+630
+170
-620
+630
+660
-150
10
2
8
71.4%
14.3%
57.1%
20 47.6% 83 49.40%
5 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
25
26
27
3S
4C
5Dx
W
N
W
-100
-150
-500
+110
+100
+50
4
11
0
28.6%
78.6%
0.0%
15 35.7% 98 46.67%
6 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
4
5
6
2D
6S
3NT
N
N
E
-110
-1430
+630
+140
-650
+660
10
3
12
71.4%
21.4%
85.7%
25 59.5% 123 48.81%
7 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
10
11
12
5D
4C
2NT
S
N
W
+200
+50
-50
+300
+50
-50
12
13
11
85.7%
92.9%
78.6%
36 85.7% 159 54.08%
8 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
16
17
18
4S
5C
1NT
E
W
W
+650
-100
+120
+650
+980
+400
9
0
12
64.3%
0.0%
85.7%
21 50.0% 180 53.57%
Back to the results
Pair EW2 - Maurice Willcock & Margaret Maidment. Total = 202.0 : 60.12% : 2nd/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
4
5
6
2S
4S
3NT
W
N
E
-100
-650
+660
+140
-650
+660
12
14
14
85.7%
100.0%
100.0%
40 95.2% 40 95.24%
2 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
10
11
12
3C
2D
2NT
N
E
W
-130
-50
-50
+300
+50
-50
8
10
11
57.1%
71.4%
78.6%
29 69.0% 69 82.14%
3 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
16
17
18
4S
4S
2H
E
E
S
+650
+420
-140
+650
+980
+400
9
4
5
64.3%
28.6%
35.7%
18 42.9% 87 69.05%
4 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
22
23
24
2NT
3NT
3NT
S
S
E
+50
+400
+490
+150
+400
+490
12
14
14
85.7%
100.0%
100.0%
40 95.2% 127 75.60%
5 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
28
29
30
5C
6H
3NT
E
W
N
-50
+1460
-460
+430
+2210
-430
0
8
8
0.0%
57.1%
57.1%
16 38.1% 143 68.10%
6 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
7
8
9
2S
4C
2Sx
W
S
N
+110
+100
+100
+110
+420
+150
11
7
8
78.6%
50.0%
57.1%
26 61.9% 169 67.06%
7 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
13
14
15
2S
3S
3D
E
S
W
-200
+50
-150
+630
+100
+100
0
9
0
0.0%
64.3%
0.0%
9 21.4% 178 60.54%
8 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
4S
W
W
S
+630
+660
-650
+630
+660
-150
10
11
3
71.4%
78.6%
21.4%
24 57.1% 202 60.12%
Back to the results
Pair EW3 - Mike Brennan & Dennis Scott. Total = 206.0 : 61.31% : 1st/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
7
8
9
2S
3S
2NT
W
E
W
+110
-100
+150
+110
+420
+150
11
4
14
78.6%
28.6%
100.0%
29 69.0% 29 69.05%
2 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
13
14
15
2NT
2Sx
2D
W
S
W
+150
-470
+90
+630
+100
+100
8
0
12
57.1%
0.0%
85.7%
20 47.6% 49 58.33%
3 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
2NT
W
W
S
+630
+660
-150
+630
+660
-150
10
11
14
71.4%
78.6%
100.0%
35 83.3% 84 66.67%
4 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
25
26
27
2S
3NT
3H
W
N
S
+110
-600
-170
+110
+100
+50
10
3
3
71.4%
21.4%
21.4%
16 38.1% 100 59.52%
5 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
1
2
3
4S
3NT
3D
S
W
W
+50
+520
+110
+200
+980
+110
10
12
14
71.4%
85.7%
100.0%
36 85.7% 136 64.76%
6 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
10
11
12
5D
3C
3NT
S
N
W
+300
-110
-150
+300
+50
-50
14
6
3
100.0%
42.9%
21.4%
23 54.8% 159 63.10%
7 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
16
17
18
5S
4S
3S
E
E
N
-100
+480
-140
+650
+980
+400
0
11
5
0.0%
78.6%
35.7%
16 38.1% 175 59.52%
8 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
22
23
24
3H
3NT
3NT
W
S
W
-100
+300
+460
+150
+400
+490
8
12
11
57.1%
85.7%
78.6%
31 73.8% 206 61.31%
Back to the results
Pair EW4 - Martin Blindell & Andy Keir. Total = 126.0 : 37.50% : 9th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
10
11
12
3NT
2C
4C
S
N
W
-630
-110
-50
+300
+50
-50
3
6
11
21.4%
42.9%
78.6%
20 47.6% 20 47.62%
2 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
16
17
18
4S
4D
1NT
E
S
W
+650
+100
-150
+650
+980
+400
9
2
1
64.3%
14.3%
7.1%
12 28.6% 32 38.10%
3 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
22
23
24
2S
Pass
3NT
W
 
E
-100
Pass
+460
+150
+400
+490
8
8
11
57.1%
57.1%
78.6%
27 64.3% 59 46.83%
4 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
28
29
30
2NT
4H
3NT
E
E
S
+180
+710
-490
+430
+2210
-430
4
0
3
28.6%
0.0%
21.4%
7 16.7% 66 39.29%
5 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
4
5
6
2S
4S
4S
W
N
W
+140
-680
-100
+140
-650
+660
14
9
0
100.0%
64.3%
0.0%
23 54.8% 89 42.38%
6 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
13
14
15
1S
3S
1H
E
S
N
+140
-170
-140
+630
+100
+100
6
3
2
42.9%
21.4%
14.3%
11 26.2% 100 39.68%
7 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
19
20
21
3NT
5D
4S
W
W
S
+600
+620
-620
+630
+660
-150
3
5
8
21.4%
35.7%
57.1%
16 38.1% 116 39.46%
8 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
25
26
27
4S
5C
4D
W
N
W
-200
-600
-150
+110
+100
+50
0
3
7
0.0%
21.4%
50.0%
10 23.8% 126 37.50%
Back to the results
Pair EW5 - Eileen Cotton & Joe Bateman. Total = 193.0 : 57.44% : 3rd/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
13
14
15
3NT
4S
3D
W
S
W
+600
+100
-50
+630
+100
+100
12
13
10
85.7%
92.9%
71.4%
35 83.3% 35 83.33%
2 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
19
20
21
3NT
3NT
4S
W
W
S
+630
+660
-680
+630
+660
-150
10
11
0
71.4%
78.6%
0.0%
21 50.0% 56 66.67%
3 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
25
26
27
2S
5C
5D
W
N
W
+110
-600
-150
+110
+100
+50
10
3
7
71.4%
21.4%
50.0%
20 47.6% 76 60.32%
4 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
1
2
3
4S
4S
3D
S
E
W
-420
+480
-100
+200
+980
+110
2
9
9
14.3%
64.3%
64.3%
20 47.6% 96 57.14%
5 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
7
8
9
2S
4H
2S
W
W
N
+110
+420
+50
+110
+420
+150
11
14
4
78.6%
100.0%
28.6%
29 69.0% 125 59.52%
6 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
16
17
18
4S
4S
1NT
E
W
W
+650
+480
-100
+650
+980
+400
9
11
10
64.3%
78.6%
71.4%
30 71.4% 155 61.51%
7 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
22
23
24
3C
5D
5C
E
N
W
-200
-600
+420
+150
+400
+490
2
1
5
14.3%
7.1%
35.7%
8 19.0% 163 55.44%
8 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
28
29
30
3NT
7H
3NT
E
E
S
+400
+2210
-460
+430
+2210
-430
8
14
8
57.1%
100.0%
57.1%
30 71.4% 193 57.44%
Back to the results
Pair EW6 - Shirley Sanders & Jean Hattersley. Total = 166.0 : 49.40% : 7th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
16
17
18
4S
4S
3NT
E
E
N
+620
+450
+400
+650
+980
+400
2
7
14
14.3%
50.0%
100.0%
23 54.8% 23 54.76%
2 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
22
23
24
3S
3NT
5C
W
S
W
-200
-600
+420
+150
+400
+490
2
1
5
14.3%
7.1%
35.7%
8 19.0% 31 36.90%
3 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
28
29
30
3NT
6H
4S
E
E
N
+430
+1460
-450
+430
+2210
-430
13
8
12
92.9%
57.1%
85.7%
33 78.6% 64 50.79%
4 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
4
5
6
1NT
6S
4C
S
N
W
-240
-1430
+170
+140
-650
+660
0
3
4
0.0%
21.4%
28.6%
7 16.7% 71 42.26%
5 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
10
11
12
3NT
5C
2D
N
N
N
-630
+50
-110
+300
+50
-50
3
13
6
21.4%
92.9%
42.9%
22 52.4% 93 44.29%
6 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
19
20
21
3C
3NT
4S
W
W
S
+130
+660
-620
+630
+660
-150
0
11
8
0.0%
78.6%
57.1%
19 45.2% 112 44.44%
7 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
25
26
27
2S
3C
3D
W
N
W
+110
-150
-50
+110
+100
+50
10
11
10
71.4%
78.6%
71.4%
31 73.8% 143 48.64%
8 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
1
2
3
5D
4S
5D
N
E
W
+200
+480
-200
+200
+980
+110
14
9
0
100.0%
64.3%
0.0%
23 54.8% 166 49.40%
Back to the results
Pair EW7 - Margaret Lewis & Monica Spencer. Total = 172.0 : 51.19% : 5th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
19
20
21
3NT
3D
4S
W
E
S
+600
+130
-650
+630
+660
-150
3
0
3
21.4%
0.0%
21.4%
6 14.3% 6 14.29%
2 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
25
26
27
2S
5C
4H
W
N
S
+110
-600
+50
+110
+100
+50
10
3
13
71.4%
21.4%
92.9%
26 61.9% 32 38.10%
3 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
1
2
3
3S
4S
4D
S
E
W
-170
+420
-100
+200
+980
+110
4
3
9
28.6%
21.4%
64.3%
16 38.1% 48 38.10%
4 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
7
8
9
2S
3S
2H
W
E
W
+110
-150
+110
+110
+420
+150
11
2
10
78.6%
14.3%
71.4%
23 54.8% 71 42.26%
5 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
13
14
15
2NT
1S
2H
W
S
N
+180
-110
-110
+630
+100
+100
10
6
6
71.4%
42.9%
42.9%
22 52.4% 93 44.29%
6 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
22
23
24
5D
2D
5C
S
N
W
+150
-150
+420
+150
+400
+490
14
6
5
100.0%
42.9%
35.7%
25 59.5% 118 46.83%
7 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
E
E
S
+430
+1460
-430
+430
+2210
-430
13
8
14
92.9%
57.1%
100.0%
35 83.3% 153 52.04%
8 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
4
5
6
2D
4S
3C
N
N
W
-130
-680
+170
+140
-650
+660
6
9
4
42.9%
64.3%
28.6%
19 45.2% 172 51.19%
Back to the results
Pair EW8 - Connie Wharton & Dorothy Ritzema. Total = 161.0 : 47.92% : 8th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
22
23
24
2S
3NT
5C
W
S
W
-100
+100
+420
+150
+400
+490
8
10
5
57.1%
71.4%
35.7%
23 54.8% 23 54.76%
2 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
W
W
S
+400
+1460
-520
+430
+2210
-430
8
8
0
57.1%
57.1%
0.0%
16 38.1% 39 46.43%
3 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
4
5
6
2D
5S
3NT
N
N
E
-130
-680
+600
+140
-650
+660
6
9
10
42.9%
64.3%
71.4%
25 59.5% 64 50.79%
4 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
10
11
12
2NT
2C
2NT
N
N
W
-120
-130
-150
+300
+50
-50
10
2
3
71.4%
14.3%
21.4%
15 35.7% 79 47.02%
5 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
16
17
18
4S
6S
2S
E
E
S
+650
+980
-110
+650
+980
+400
9
14
8
64.3%
100.0%
57.1%
31 73.8% 110 52.38%
6 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
25
26
27
1S
3C
3H
W
N
S
+110
-170
-170
+110
+100
+50
10
8
3
71.4%
57.1%
21.4%
21 50.0% 131 51.98%
7 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
1
2
3
2D
3S
3S
N
E
S
-90
+200
-140
+200
+980
+110
8
0
2
57.1%
0.0%
14.3%
10 23.8% 141 47.96%
8 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
7
8
9
2H
5C
2S
S
S
N
-110
+150
+50
+110
+420
+150
4
12
4
28.6%
85.7%
28.6%
20 47.6% 161 47.92%
Back to the results
Pair EW9 - Colin Graham & Brian Fleetham. Total = 169.0 : 50.30% : 6th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Sheila Pullin &
Martin Thompson
25
26
27
3D
3NT
4H
S
N
S
-130
+100
+50
+110
+100
+50
2
14
13
14.3%
100.0%
92.9%
29 69.0% 29 69.05%
2 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
1
2
3
2S
4S
3D
N
E
W
-140
+450
-100
+200
+980
+110
6
6
9
42.9%
42.9%
64.3%
21 50.0% 50 59.52%
3 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
7
8
9
2S
3NT
2S
W
N
N
-100
-430
+50
+110
+420
+150
6
0
4
42.9%
0.0%
28.6%
10 23.8% 60 47.62%
4 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
13
14
15
3NT
3S
2H
W
S
N
+630
-170
+100
+630
+100
+100
14
3
14
100.0%
21.4%
100.0%
31 73.8% 91 54.17%
5 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
19
20
21
3NT
5D
3S
W
W
S
+630
+620
-200
+630
+660
-150
10
5
12
71.4%
35.7%
85.7%
27 64.3% 118 56.19%
6 Bruce Heather &
Freda Heather
28
29
30
3NT
6H
3NT
E
E
N
+400
+1430
-460
+430
+2210
-430
8
2
8
57.1%
14.3%
57.1%
18 42.9% 136 53.97%
7 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
4
5
6
3D
4S
3C
N
N
W
-130
-680
+170
+140
-650
+660
6
9
4
42.9%
64.3%
28.6%
19 45.2% 155 52.72%
8 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
10
11
12
3NT
3NT
2NT
N
N
W
-630
-400
-50
+300
+50
-50
3
0
11
21.4%
0.0%
78.6%
14 33.3% 169 50.30%
Back to the results
Pair EW10 - Howard Coutts & Kath Siday. Total = 105.0 : 31.25% : 10th/10 : Top is 14.
Round Versus Board Contract By Score Best MP % Round total Cumulative
1 Andrew Simmons &
Christine Simmons
28
29
30
1NT
6H
3NT
E
E
S
+150
+1460
-490
+430
+2210
-430
2
8
3
14.3%
57.1%
21.4%
13 31.0% 13 30.95%
2 Christine Bainbridge
& Pat Robinson
4
5
6
3D
6NT
1NT
N
N
E
-150
-1440
+210
+140
-650
+660
2
0
8
14.3%
0.0%
57.1%
10 23.8% 23 27.38%
3 Pauline Hall &
Linda Davison
10
11
12
3NT
3C
3NT
N
N
W
-630
-110
-250
+300
+50
-50
3
6
0
21.4%
42.9%
0.0%
9 21.4% 32 25.40%
4 Marian Wilson &
Isobel Rooney
16
17
18
4S
4S
1NT
E
W
W
+650
+450
-150
+650
+980
+400
9
7
1
64.3%
50.0%
7.1%
17 40.5% 49 29.17%
5 Maurice Denham
& Dot Denham
22
23
24
2S
2H
6NT
W
N
W
-200
-200
-50
+150
+400
+490
2
4
0
14.3%
28.6%
0.0%
6 14.3% 55 26.19%
6 Veronica Fuller &
Marjorie Lockett
1
2
3
3D
4S
2S
N
E
S
+150
+420
-110
+200
+980
+110
12
3
4
85.7%
21.4%
28.6%
19 45.2% 74 29.37%
7 Margaret Young
& Brian Dawson
7
8
9
2H
3D
3NT
S
N
W
-140
+100
-200
+110
+420
+150
2
7
0
14.3%
50.0%
0.0%
9 21.4% 83 28.23%
8 Julia Palmieri &
Eileen Lorimer
13
14
15
1NT
4S
2H
W
S
N
+120
+100
-110
+630
+100
+100
3
13
6
21.4%
92.9%
42.9%
22 52.4% 105 31.25%